My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/20/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
01/20/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 10:28:26 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 10:28:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday, January 20, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#13) #04-2973 MINNETONKA CUSTOM HOMES INC., 4753 NORTH SHORE <br /> DRIVE,AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> (9:04-9:35 P.M.) <br /> Steve Saxton, of Minnetonka Custom Homes, was present. <br /> Gundlach stated that the applicant requests the following in conjunction with a previously <br /> approved project: <br /> 1. After-the-fact variance to allow 49%hardcover in the 75-250' zone when 44%was <br /> previously approved and 25%is normally allowed. <br /> 2. Conditional use permit to allow retaining walls to be constructed within 5' of the <br /> property line. <br /> Gundlach explained that the applicants received a number of variances in April of 2003 in <br /> order to construct a new residence on the property located at 4753 North Shore Drive. <br /> Hardcover variances were received for the 0-75' and 75-250' zones of 9.34% and 44.85% <br /> respectively. During the building permit approval process it was concluded that the City <br /> Engineer needed to review the grading plan and that to result in proper drainage on the <br /> property the site plan and grading plan required minor revisions. The changes included <br /> raising the house approximately 2 feet and installing gutters directing all the water to the <br /> driveway and into the right-of-way of North Shore Drive. Also, approved was a short <br /> retaining wall on the west side of the home to allow for a side entrance. <br /> Following construction of the home and prior to a final inspection, the City's Building <br /> Inspector noticed a number of retaining walls were constructed in the 75-250' zone in an <br /> effort to control the drainage on the property. Also, repair of an existing wall at the top of <br /> the bluff and a second wall at the top of the bluff were also constructed all of which were <br /> not approved with either the building permit plan or the plan approved in April of 2003 by <br /> the Planning Commission and City Council. Staff informed the applicants that this work <br /> was not approved, that the walls should be removed, and that the approved grading plan <br /> should be followed or an after-the-fact hardcover variance to allow 49.2%hardcover when <br /> 44.85% was originally approved would be required if the walls were to remain. A <br /> conditional use permit is also required in order to allow retaining walls within 5' of the <br /> property boundary. <br /> Gundlach pointed out that, at the time of building permit review, the applicants proposed <br /> less hardcover in the 75-250' zone than was approved by the original plan. This occurred <br /> because the applicants went from a footprint of 1,500 s.f. to 1,451 s.f. and a smaller <br /> driveway/walk (525 s.f. to 481 s.f.). At the time, the applicants were also approved to <br /> construct a retaining wall on the west side of the home in order to construct a side entrance, <br /> which added 8 s.fl of hardcover,bringing the total hardcover to 44% (when 44.85%was <br /> approved by the Planning Commission and City Council). <br /> PAGE 27 of 53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.