Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday, January 20, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-2971 HICKORY FINE HOMES INC., 3220 AND 3240 WATERTOWN ROAD, <br /> LOT LINE RE-ARRANGEMENT—Continued) <br /> Since both lots drain directly to a creek which flows to Stubbs Bay, from a water quality <br /> standpoint, they function as lakeshore lots. There is little ability to collect significant <br /> amounts of stormwater runoff from either lot before it reaches the creek. Therefore, <br /> Gaffron maintained that Stormwater treatment provisions should be added to the plan in <br /> the form of required substantial buffer strips along the creek, which must remain vegetated <br /> with high grasses and not be fertilized. <br /> As with the park fee, there is some question as to whether this subdivision should be <br /> subject to the Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee established by City Ordinance. The fee <br /> is established at $2,700 per acre, with a cap of 4.0 acres to be charged per lot. For this <br /> property, Lot 1 would be charged the maximum 4.0 acre fee($10,800) and Lot 2 would be <br /> charged for 3.47 acres ($9,369). However, a case can be made that Lot 2 already exists as <br /> a viable building site, and the real intent of the subdivision is to make Lot 1 buildable. An <br /> argument can be made that only the fee for Lot 1 should be required. <br /> With regard to septic, Gaffron noted that Septic Systems Inspector Matt Bolterman has <br /> reviewed the submitted septic testing and confirms that each lot has suitable sites for <br /> adequately-sized septic systems. <br /> While the proposed plan appears feasible and appropriate based on the information <br /> submitted to date, Gaffron reiterated that the lack of a requested proposed driveway and <br /> creek crossing plan, and the lack of proposed house locations to help in determining the <br /> feasibility of house development on these somewhat limited sites, suggests tabling may be <br /> appropriate until that information is submitted for review. He recommended that the <br /> Commission briefly review, provide comment, and then table pending receipt and City <br /> Engineer review of requested driveway and creek crossing plans. <br /> Acting Chair Mabusth asked if the applicant had begun the process with the MCWD. <br /> Henderson indicated that this had begun. <br /> Gary Roller, 3280 Watertown Road, the neighbor on the west side, stated that he had a <br /> difficult time seeing the building site on the back lot. <br /> Gaffron pointed out that the buildable site was tucked in against a 45' setback from the <br /> west lot line,between the creek setback and wetland. <br /> Mark Summers, 75 Crystal Creek Road, pointed out that his home fell 60' north of <br /> Watertown Road and 75-100' west of the property and he, too, was concerned with the <br /> placement of a home on lot one. <br /> PAGE 23 of 53 <br />