Laserfiche WebLink
" MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 17,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3131 Steve Bohl,Continued) <br /> Bremer noted the configuration of Outlot B is long and narrow, which limits the type of amenities that <br /> could be placed in that area. <br /> Rahn inquired what the approximate dimensions are of the outlot. <br /> Gronberg stated it averages around 70 to 75 feet wide. <br /> Gaffron indicated it is 181 feet deep. <br /> Gronberg inquired whether any portion of the easement would be counted towards the 10%recreation <br /> area. <br /> Gaffron stated it could be. <br /> Fritzler inquired how credit would be given for the easement if it is not located on this site. <br /> Gaffron stated the developer is probably paying something for the easement from the church and that it <br /> could be included in the calculation if the Planning Commission determines that that is appropriate. <br /> Gronberg commented it does not necessarily have to be a private trail. <br /> Kempf stated he is unclear how it could become a private trail and that in all likelihood it would be used <br /> by the general public given the location of the public park. <br /> Leslie commented a gate limiting access by the public could be installed. <br /> Bremer stated it is likely that this development will be short on the 10 percent land donation and that the <br /> Planning Commission will need to decide whether that is acceptable. <br /> Gaffron inquired whether the street should be considered a public road or a private road. <br /> Gronberg stated the city would still receive easements over the road even if it is a private road. <br /> Leslie inquired whether there are any reasons why this road should be a public road versus a private road. <br /> Gaffron stated it becomes a matter of maintenance of the road. Gaffron stated Stone Bay has a number of <br /> private roads and that in his opinion it should be a private road in order to be consistent with what has <br /> been approved in the past for RPUD development. <br /> Leslie pointed out since there is a cul-de-sac at the end of the road and does not connect to Glendale, it <br /> would make sense to have it be a private road. <br /> PAGE 6 <br />