Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 17,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3160 Judson Dayton,Continued) <br /> Dayton stated there is the possibility of sewer from Little Orchard sometime in the future but that at this <br /> time he is contemplating a septic system for Parcel 2. <br /> Fritzler commented it makes sense to do it the way the applicant is proposing. <br /> Fritzler moved,Leslie seconded,to recommend approval of Application#05-3160,Judson M. <br /> Dayton,825 Old Crystal Bay Road South,to allow,one, a combination of the two smaller parcels <br /> into one 5-acre building site; two,a rearrangement of the lot line between this combination and the <br /> 21-acre parcel to straighten out that common lot line; and three,formalization of a driveway <br /> easement through the 21-acre parcel out to Old Crystal Bay Road to serve the 5-acre parcel. <br /> Gaffron inquired whether a plat would be required. <br /> Fritzler indicated a plat would not be required. <br /> Gaffron inquired whether the motion is approving the lot line rearrangement,which includes Parcel 1 and <br /> Parcel 2, and whether the fees associated with development of Parcel 1 at this point are being waived until <br /> the time the parcel is subdivided. <br /> Fritzler stated that is correct. Fritzler stated the fees would be calculated at the time there is a further <br /> subdivision. <br /> Gaffron noted the park dedication fee is based on each individual lot that would be created. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br /> 8. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING <br /> COUNCIL MEETINGS SEPTEMBER 26 AND OCTOBER 10,2005 <br /> Gaffron reported the Interspace application was approved at the October 10th City Council meeting and <br /> the Narrows application was denied based on the parking situation,the possibility of drawing in <br /> customers from outside the community and the potential impact to the neighborhood <br /> Leslie stated his impression was that the Council did not take that action because of the public comments <br /> received but that the Council's considerations were very different from the considerations of the Planning <br /> Commission. Leslie stated the application was discussed in terms of noise and parking and violations of <br /> the current operation,but that it was apparent to him that the Council had already decided that the <br /> application would be denied even before it was heard. Leslie stated he was discouraged by the action of <br /> PAGE 26 <br />