My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/17/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
10/17/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 9:38:06 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:38:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' MINUTES OF THE <br /> • ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,October 17,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3142 Christopher and Emily Chapman, Continued) <br /> Chapman inquired why a third stall would be preferred rather than a shed. <br /> Rahn noted there are no height restrictions on sheds and that the Planning Commission currently does not <br /> have a plan showing the design of the shed. <br /> Chapman indicated they would like to make the shed similar to the house and that they would like the <br /> shed to store various items. Chapman indicated she would be willing to submit plans of the shed. <br /> Kempf stated the applicant's husband also explained that the shed would be similar in appearance to the <br /> house. <br /> Chapman stated they would be agreeable to consider a third stall on the garage but that they had the <br /> understanding it would require a significant variance. <br /> Rahn stated he would not be in favor of trading the front sidewalk for a shed. Rahn stated he understands <br /> the need for storage,but that the Planning Commission typically does not trade non-structural hardcover <br /> for structural hardcover. <br /> Chapman indicated the steppingstones were planned regardless of whether they build the shed or not. <br /> Rahn inquired what the size of the current garage is. <br /> Gundlach stated the garage is approximately 25' by 28'. <br /> Bremer stated given the length of the lot and the location of the shed behind the trees, she would be in <br /> favor of a 10' by 10' shed subject to plans being submitted. <br /> Fritzler stated the fact that there are trees there now does not guarantee that there will be trees there in the <br /> future. <br /> Leslie moved,Fritzler seconded,to recommend denial of application#05-3142, Christopher and <br /> Emily Chapman,3775 Bayside Road. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 1,Bremer Opposed. <br /> 5. #05-3146 MARK AND PAMELA PALM, 1447 PARK DRIVE,VARIANCES,7:40 P.M.— <br /> 8:07 P.M. <br /> Mark Palm,Applicant, and Tom Brennan,Friend,were present. <br /> Gundlach stated the applicant is requesting the following variances in order to replace an existing <br /> detached garage: <br /> PAGE 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.