My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/19/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
09/19/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 9:36:19 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:36:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ` ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,September 19,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3121 THE NARROWS SALOON, CONTINUED) <br /> Benshoof stated according to City Code,this expansion would require 63 spots. Benshoof stated the <br /> greatest demand for parking from this establishment is in the evening hours and that the study <br /> demonstrated at peak demand times that the Narrow's Saloon would require less than half of the parking <br /> that is available in the area. Benshoof stated in his view this expansion does make sense in terms of the <br /> parking. Benshoof reviewed the peak demand times for parking for the Narrow's Saloon and pointed out <br /> that their study does account for an increase in the park-n-ride of six parking stalls as well as an increased <br /> demand for the Narrow's Saloon. Benshoof stated the demand is below the 129 stalls that are available in <br /> the City-owned lot. <br /> Benshoof stated it is their conclusion that there is adequate parking to handle the expansion and to <br /> accommodate the future needs of parking in this area. <br /> Bremer inquired whether the size of the current parking stalls would have any impact on their study. <br /> Benshoof noted that was an item that was included in Staff's initial report but was not addressed in this <br /> study since it tends to be a city-issue, and if the city has concerns about the layout of the parking lot,the <br /> city should investigate that issue. Benshoof stated it was their approach to count the number of available <br /> stalls and that he did not notice anything so contrary to standards that would render the parking lot <br /> nonfunctional. <br /> Winkey questioned whether the adequacy of the lot should be addressed based on what the code requires. <br /> Benshoof stated it is typical to base a study like this on the number of lots that are configured. <br /> Winkey stated a new parking lot would be required to conform with the City's requirements and that <br /> perhaps this lot should be required to meet those same standards as part of the parking study. <br /> Benshoof stated he based his study on the number of existing parking stalls and that he did not see <br /> anything that would make the lot nonfunctional or hazardous. <br /> Rahn stated if the City decides to restripe the parking lot in the future,there would be fewer parking stalls <br /> available. <br /> Benshoof stated if the layout of the lot is studied,the parking spaces may increase or decrease and would <br /> require a separate study. <br /> Leslie inquired whether there has been a higher rate of incidents in this lot compared to other lots related <br /> to its nonconforming striping. <br /> Sergeant Erickson stated he is not aware of any problems having occurred in the lot. <br /> PAGE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.