My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/19/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
09/19/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 9:36:19 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:36:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday, September 19,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3152 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT,CONTINUED) <br /> Gary Demele, 3400 Watertown Road, indicated his property is to the east of this development and that he <br /> applauds the Planning Commission's thoughts on this application. Demele stated in his opinion Lot 4 <br /> does not work, citing eight-foot retaining walls and a limited back yard. <br /> Demele stated the trees make this site attractive and that he would like to see if those mature trees could <br /> be preserved. Demele presented a picture of the site to the Planning Commission. <br /> Demele stated the site is not level and the layout of the houses really gives the appearance of a vertical <br /> perspective. Demele encouraged the Planning Commission to keep in mind what he has to look at also. <br /> Steve Gagne, 3505 Watertown Road, stated if Lot 4 is retained,he would like to see the driveway off of <br /> Watertown to help preserve the trees. Gagne stated he is undecided on the proposal. <br /> Bohland stated the retaining walls are depicted if it is accessed off the private road rather than off of <br /> Watertown Road. <br /> Gaffron stated up to 12 percent vertical curve is allowed for private roads. <br /> Kempf encouraged the applicant to take the initiative on the clustering option. <br /> There were no additional public comments regarding this application. <br /> Jurgens recommended the natural features of the property be identified on the map. Jurgens stated in his <br /> opinion the driveway is good as proposed and that he likes the canopy of trees over the roadway. <br /> Gronberg stated if Lot 4 is eliminated,the road could perhaps be relocated somewhat to preserve some <br /> additional trees. <br /> Gaffron commented the City has an existing ordinance which requires a vegetation preservation and <br /> protection plan and another ordinance that discusses the character of the land which could limit <br /> development on the site if the site is found to be unsuitable by the Council for subdivision or development <br /> due to flooding, improper drainage, steep slopes, etc. Gaffron stated there is enough language in existing <br /> codes to require that the existing wooded areas and trees be identified. Gaffron stated a tree survey would <br /> be useful in this case. <br /> Leslie stated he would find a post-development elevation from Watertown Road extremely helpful. <br /> Rahn moved,Kempf seconded,to table Application#05-3152,Bohland Development on behalf of <br /> James D.Mackinnon,et al, "3500"Watertown Road,Preliminary Plat. VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> PAGE 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.