My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/15/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08/15/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 9:34:24 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:34:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 15,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-3039 City of Orono,Proposed Ordinance Amendment,Continued) <br /> greater than four feet in width could be allowed with a conditional use permit. Gaffron stated a basis for <br /> the wider dock could be presented to the City and approval made on a case-by-case basis. <br /> Jurgens inquired whether there is any way possible that someone could request a dock that is wider than <br /> four-feet wide if the language is not changed. <br /> Gaffron stated the four-foot width is a performance standard and that a variance could be granted to the <br /> width standard if a hardship is demonstrated. <br /> Jurgens stated in his opinion there is some detriment to a six-foot dock versus a four-foot dock if the dock <br /> is merely used to access the lake. Jurgens stated he does see some circumstances where a hardship could <br /> be demonstrated for a wider dock,but that if the dock is merely used to access the lake,a dock wider than <br /> four-feet wide may not be necessary. Jurgens stated in his opinion a variance application may be the <br /> appropriate vehicle to address situations where a wider dock is desired rather than a conditional use <br /> permit. <br /> Rahn stated in his view if the DNR currently has a standard regarding dock width,the City should be <br /> consistent with that. <br /> Gaffron stated Staff would speak with the DNR this week regarding that issue. <br /> Bremer stated she would prefer making it a conditional use permit rather than a variance. <br /> Jurgens inquired what type of conditions would be imposed to allow a wider dock. <br /> Rahn noted a hardship does not need to be shown under a conditional use permit. <br /> Jurgens stated certain requirements should be in place in order to allow a wider dock. <br /> Bremer inquired how Commissioner Jurgens feels about being consistent with the DNR requirement. <br /> Jurgens stated he is not aware of a DNR standard but that he may be willing to adopt a standard that is <br /> consistent with the DNR if one exists. <br /> Leslie inquired whether there are any other agencies that would govern the width of docks. <br /> Gaffron stated the LMCD governs the docks on Lake Minnetonka. <br /> Leslie inquired whether the DNR is consistent with LMCD's requirements. <br /> Gaffron stated it is his understanding they are attempting to be consistent. <br /> PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.