My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/20/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
06/20/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 9:31:00 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:30:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 20,2005 <br /> • 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 6. #05-3100 LARRY AND SHERYL PALM, 1146 WILDHURST TRAIL,VARIANCE,6:36 <br /> P.M.—7:02 P.M. <br /> Larry and Sheryl Palm,Applicants,were present. <br /> Gundlach stated this application appeared at the May Planning Commission meeting requesting lot area <br /> and lot width variances as well as a conditional use permit to allow construction of a new residence. <br /> Gundlach indicated the application was tabled to allow the city engineer to review the various submitted <br /> drainage and grading plans. <br /> Gundlach stated the city engineer and building inspector met on site to discuss an appropriate grading <br /> plan that would benefit the neighbors,protect the interests of the City, and be somewhat of a compromise <br /> of the four different plans submitted by the applicant. Gundlach stated the city engineer and building <br /> inspector concluded that a retaining wall extended slightly over the lot line would be the best solution, <br /> with an easement being granted by the neighbor for the encroaching wall to allow future maintenance. In <br /> addition, the city engineer is recommending that a rain garden or similar feature be included in the plan at <br /> the point where the two swales meet on the lakeside of the home. Gundlach indicated the purpose of the <br /> rain garden would be to dissipate the energy of the runoff in an effort to prevent erosion into the lake. <br /> Gundlach noted the applicant has agreed to extend the retaining wall onto the adjoining property slightly <br /> but is opposed to the rain garden. The applicant has submitted a maintenance/owner agreement relating <br /> to the retaining wall that has been signed by both parties. Gundlach indicated it is her understanding the <br /> adjoining property owner does not want to grant an easement. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the requested lot area and lot width variances and approval of the <br /> conditional use permit to allow retaining walls and grading within five feet of the lot line. However,the <br /> plan submitted and attached to this report as Exhibit A must be revised prior to Council review pending <br /> conclusions by the Planning Commission regarding the following: <br /> 1. Requirement of a rain garden or an alternate graded landscape feature that will spread water out over a <br /> wider area where the swales converge on the lakeside of the walls,rather than concentrating the water at <br /> the end of the swales to a single point; <br /> 2. The wall design should be revised on the grading plan whereby the tail end of the wall extends over <br /> the lot line. The length of this wall should be minimized; <br /> 3. Agreement with the adjacent property owner on the ownership and maintenance of the wall <br /> constructed over the lot line; <br /> 4. Screening of the walls from the lake. <br /> Rahn inquired whether Staff has a grading plan that has been reviewed and approved by the City <br /> Engineer. <br /> PAGE 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.