My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/21/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
03/21/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 9:22:41 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:22:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 21,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3085 Jul Ann Hair Fashions, Continued) <br /> Overson noted the neighboring lot is not currently being utilized and that there is plenty of parking <br /> space available. <br /> Gundlach stated if the bowling alley reopens, the parking would not be sufficient on that site and the <br /> parking agreement with Jul Ann's would probably be terminated. <br /> Winkey inquired how many employees Jul Ann's employs. <br /> Julie Kreslins stated she has four employees, with a maximum of three beauticians being there at one <br /> time one day out of the week. Kreslins noted she is reducing the hours her business is open each week <br /> and that they would like a more economical location. <br /> Overson commented the type of clientele that would utilize the parking would not be parking on the site <br /> for the entire day but rather 15 minutes to an hour. <br /> Berg noted there was a beauty salon at that location for approximately 20 years. <br /> Gaffron stated the City has no record of the beauty shop ever being granted approval. <br /> Kempf stated one of his concerns is when the situation with the Keaveny building changes and how the <br /> termination of the parking agreement and its impact on this site would be enforceable by the City. <br /> Gaffron stated the City Attorney stated the City would be put in a difficult situation if the parking <br /> agreement is terminated and would be faced with possibly evicting the tenant. <br /> Kreslins stated they would be willing to stipulate in writing that if the parking agreement is terminated <br /> for some reason,they would vacate the premises. <br /> Bremer inquired whether the shared parking agreement could be made a part of the main lease with <br /> Overson. <br /> Overson stated that could be incorporated into the lease. <br /> Bremer stated she would still like to see some notice to the City if the shared parking arrangement is <br /> terminated. Bremer noted this application would need to be delayed to allow the City Attorney time to <br /> review the lease document. <br /> Harry Kreslins indicated he is fine with that arrangement. <br /> Jurgens noted the parking on this site is already substandard without the addition of another tenant, and <br /> inquired why the landlord is not being required to add more parking to bring this lot up to code. <br /> PAGE 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.