My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/21/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
03/21/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 9:22:41 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:22:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 21,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-3010 Theodore Capra,Continued) <br /> Alexander stated they could piece in a foot and a half on top of the first floor rather than tearing down <br /> the first floor walls,which would help preserve more of the original house. Alexander stated that type <br /> of construction is more expensive. <br /> Jurgens stated he would like to see the hardcover reduced to 30 percent. <br /> Winkey noted they were denied at 30 percent on the rebuild proposal and that the Planning Commission <br /> may not be achieving their ultimate goal of 25 percent hardcover by allowing the remodel at 32 percent. <br /> Winkey stated in his view this is a rebuild and that the objective should be to reduce the amount of <br /> hardcover to less than 30 percent. <br /> Capra stated the cost to do a remodel project is thousands of dollars more and that it would make more <br /> sense to construct new on this lot but at 30 percent hardcover. <br /> Berg stated in her opinion this is a rebuild and not a remodel. Berg inquired why the proposal on the <br /> new residence was denied. <br /> Rahn stated the Council denied the previous proposal and directed the applicant to reduce the hardcover <br /> to 25 percent strictly because it was a rebuild. <br /> Bremer inquired whether the additional removals of hardcover outlined on Exhibit F would bring the <br /> hardcover below 30 percent. <br /> Gundlach stated the additional removals would bring it down to 29 percent. Gundlach stated the <br /> applicant would like to retain the existing driveway. Gundlach indicated if a portion of the driveway is <br /> not removed under the current proposal in Exhibit F, it would reduce the hardcover to 31.5 percent. <br /> Capra stated he would rather do without the patio than reducing the driveway any further. <br /> Gundlach noted she is not suggesting the entire patio be removed but rather reducing it by <br /> approximately 200 square feet. <br /> Capra stated he would be willing to reduce the size of the patio in exchange for keeping more driveway. <br /> Bremer moved,Jurgens seconded,to recommend approval of Application#04-3010,3534 Ivy <br /> Place,granting of a hardcover variance to permit 30 percent hardcover in the 75'-250', a <br /> hardcover variance to permit only so much hardcover in the 0-75' as required to permit access to <br /> the lake,subject to the reductions in the hardcover to 30 percent, and further subject to the <br /> recommendations of the City Engineer. AYES: 4,Nays 2,Berg and Rahn opposed. <br /> Rahn stated he is opposed to the motion since it does not meet the intent of what the City hopes to <br /> achieve by remodeling existing buildings. Rahn stated if 30 percent is to be allowed,he would prefer a <br /> new residence be constructed. <br /> Berg concurred with Rahn. <br /> PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.