Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 21,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#03-3066 William and Anita Rouse,Continued) <br /> Gaffron commented since the City did approve the improvements to the house in that location,that it <br /> would be feasible to make the house the best quality it can be. Gaffron stated it is likely the applicant <br /> will want to retain the original walls to avoid the need to meet the required setback. <br /> Rahn inquired how wide that portion of the house is. <br /> Gaffron indicated it is 28 feet wide. <br /> Rahn stated the City should try to make this house compliant. <br /> Winkey noted the Planning Commission at the time it approved this application thought the foundation <br /> was adequate. <br /> Rahn noted one of the reasons given by applicants for not relocating a residence is the fact that the <br /> foundation is in good shape. Rahn stated if the Planning Commission had known that this foundation <br /> was not in good condition,they would have required a 10-foot setback. <br /> Jurgens stated in his opinion this has become a rebuild rather than a remodel project. <br /> Rahn moved,Winkey seconded,to recommend that Application#04-3066,William and Anita <br /> Rouse,4051 Highwood Road,be required to meet the 10-foot setback if the applicants elect to <br /> substantially repair or replace the existing foundation. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 1,Bremer opposed. <br /> NAVARRE VISIONING LETTER <br /> Gundlach inquired whether all members of the Planning Commission were in favor of sending the letter <br /> to the City Council regarding the future redevelopment of Navarre. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to send the letter to the City Council. <br /> The Planning Commission reviewed a list of applications that had recently been approved or denied by <br /> the City Council and the recommendations given by the Planning Commission on those applications. <br /> PAGE 22 <br />