Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 21,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3089 Theodore Rozeboom, Continued) <br /> Gaffron noted the fence line has to be located behind the 75-foot line in order to be six feet. <br /> Rozeboom commented he would like to retain the fence for privacy. Rozeboom stated he attempted to <br /> nestle the hot tub in among the existing trees. Rozeboom inquired how he can accommodate the <br /> neighbors' views. <br /> Rahn suggested the applicant work with Staff and that the Planning Commission is not able to design <br /> the applicant's plans. <br /> Rozeboom stated the retaining walls could be removed, which are not depicted in the current plans and <br /> would reduce hardcover further. Rozeboom stated in his view there is a hardship due to the topography <br /> of the land and that they need to retain a turnaround on the site in the 250'-500' zone since they have a <br /> hidden driveway. <br /> Rahn suggested the applicant make whatever reductions possible in the hardcover. Rahn noted the City <br /> typically approves turnarounds with less square footage than what exists on this lot currently. <br /> Rozeboom stated a portion of the turnaround is utilized for parking. <br /> Rahn suggested tabling the application to allow the applicant time to work with Staff. <br /> Gundlach pointed out an average lakeshore setback variance would still be required for the hot tub even <br /> if it is relocated. <br /> Rozeboom stated he felt the hot tub would not restrict the views of the neighbors but that the issue is the <br /> screening of the hot tub. <br /> Winkey inquired whether the patio or deck being proposed would be included in the revised plans. <br /> Rozeboom stated the canopy piece would be removed but that the deck is included in their plans and has <br /> been calculated in the hardcover. Rozeboom noted he felt the deck would not affect the neighbors' view <br /> of the lake. <br /> Bremer moved,Rahn seconded,to table Application#05-3089,2967 Casco Point Road,to allow <br /> the applicants time to redesign their plans. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> PAGE 11 <br />