My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/21/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
03/21/2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 9:22:41 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:22:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 21,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3089 Theodore Rozeboom, Continued) <br /> Gaffron noted the fence line has to be located behind the 75-foot line in order to be six feet. <br /> Rozeboom commented he would like to retain the fence for privacy. Rozeboom stated he attempted to <br /> nestle the hot tub in among the existing trees. Rozeboom inquired how he can accommodate the <br /> neighbors' views. <br /> Rahn suggested the applicant work with Staff and that the Planning Commission is not able to design <br /> the applicant's plans. <br /> Rozeboom stated the retaining walls could be removed, which are not depicted in the current plans and <br /> would reduce hardcover further. Rozeboom stated in his view there is a hardship due to the topography <br /> of the land and that they need to retain a turnaround on the site in the 250'-500' zone since they have a <br /> hidden driveway. <br /> Rahn suggested the applicant make whatever reductions possible in the hardcover. Rahn noted the City <br /> typically approves turnarounds with less square footage than what exists on this lot currently. <br /> Rozeboom stated a portion of the turnaround is utilized for parking. <br /> Rahn suggested tabling the application to allow the applicant time to work with Staff. <br /> Gundlach pointed out an average lakeshore setback variance would still be required for the hot tub even <br /> if it is relocated. <br /> Rozeboom stated he felt the hot tub would not restrict the views of the neighbors but that the issue is the <br /> screening of the hot tub. <br /> Winkey inquired whether the patio or deck being proposed would be included in the revised plans. <br /> Rozeboom stated the canopy piece would be removed but that the deck is included in their plans and has <br /> been calculated in the hardcover. Rozeboom noted he felt the deck would not affect the neighbors' view <br /> of the lake. <br /> Bremer moved,Rahn seconded,to table Application#05-3089,2967 Casco Point Road,to allow <br /> the applicants time to redesign their plans. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> PAGE 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.