My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2001 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-22-2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2012 3:36:12 PM
Creation date
3/8/2012 3:36:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 22, 2001 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #4 — Forest Lake Landing, Continued) <br />access, the City would need to construct a stairway due to the topography by the lakeshore. Walter <br />commented in his view taxpayer money could be spent in a better way to provide access to the general <br />public than by improving this area. <br />Walter stated he also has concerns regarding security, noting this area is not visible from the roadway, <br />which can lead to a number of issues. Walter stated people cannot say with any certainty that this <br />access point will only be used by the residents in the Tonkaview area. <br />John Hollander, 200 Hollander Road, inquired whether this was a platted subdivision and if the road is <br />private or public. <br />Flint stated the fire lane is a platted public road. <br />Ed Garlock, 1179 Elmwood Avenue, stated he lived on the other side of Forest Lake for 30 years, <br />and enjoyed watching his kids play in the area by the Lines house over the years. Garlock stated in his <br />view it should remain as a natural area, and suggested the City deal with the Mullin issue prior to <br />approving this access point. <br />Flint closed the public hearing at 8:26 p.m. <br />• Sansevere commented he has visited this access point, and in his view the area is too secluded to allow <br />unlimited type access. Sansevere stated he has issues with fishing and swimming, and would like to see <br />the lily pads in that area protected. Sansevere commented he also feels the residents in that area are <br />entitled to certain protections and that this area should be kept more passive. Sansevere suggested <br />limiting this access point to pedestrian traffic only, with no fishing or swimming allowed. <br />Sansevere inquired what the 1940 Supreme Court case involved. <br />Tom Barrett stated that case dealt with the question of whether a township or municipality had <br />appropriately vacated a public access to Lake Minnetonka, with the Supreme Court placing a high value <br />on the people's right to access the lake. Barrett stated the method for vacating a public access has <br />changed somewhat. <br />Sansevere stated he does have concerns for the people who live next to these lake access points. <br />Sansevere noted the majority of the people who live near this access point would prefer the area be <br />made into a natural area. Sansevere stated he would prefer this access point remain passive, with the <br />uses being restricted due to the area being secluded. <br />White stated the biggest issues with this access point are the parking and the security. White noted <br />crime has actually gone down since September 11`x' due to people becoming more vigilant. White <br />stated he would like to see the vegetation in the water remain in front of the lakeshore, noting that <br />fishing and swimming would destroy that. <br />White stated he is not in favor of giving away public property, and commented the classification of this <br />site and the permitted uses are very important. White stated the uses being suggested by the Park <br />PAGE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.