My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2001 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-22-2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2012 3:36:12 PM
Creation date
3/8/2012 3:36:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NIINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 22, 2001 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #01 -2714 Fred Puzak, Continued) <br />Puzak stated even though the new house is larger than the existing house, the hardcover is being - reduced <br />due to reductions being made to the driveway in the 0 -75' setback. <br />Sansevere stated in his view state law should require that septic systems be based on the size of the house <br />rather than the number of bedrooms. Sansevere commented the Applicant would not need to change his <br />design if he simply choose to call one room a den and the other a library. <br />Gaffron stated state law defines a bedroom as a room with a closet. Gaffron stated once the closet is <br />removed from a room, it is no longer considered a bedroom. Gaffron stated the property owner would be <br />required to obtain a building permit if he decides later on to add a closest. <br />Puzak stated he has submitted this conceptual design so they could address the hardcover and setback <br />issues, and that the new design would reflect three or four bedrooms. Puzak stated he would be revising <br />his plan. <br />Stoddard stated the new plan is an improvement over what currently exists, noting the Planning <br />Commission reviewed a plan that depicted five bedrooms. Stoddard stated the plan before the Council <br />could conceivably be for a seven - bedroom house with some minor alterations.- Stoddard stated the main <br />issue before the Planning Commission was the septic. <br />is William Franklin, 1730 New Brighton Boulevard, stated he is the owner of the property between Puzak's <br />proposed house and the sewer line. Franklin stated in his view there appears to be some confusion <br />regarding the granting of an easement over his property for a sewer line. Franklin indicated he would be <br />agreeable to granting the easement as well as sharing in the cost of extending the sewer <br />line. <br />Franklin stated they have discussed the possibility of him either selling this property to another <br />individual or to Puzak. Franklin stated in either case he would give his consent to a sewer easement <br />across the property. Franklin stated should his property ever be developed, he would also need to have a <br />sewer connection to the two lots. <br />White commented that City sewer would be a benefit given the close proximity of the lakeshore in this <br />area. <br />Franklin indicated he was unaware of the fact that Puzak wanted to construct a private septic system on <br />his property. <br />Puzak noted there was a public hearing held on this matter on October 171, at which time <br />Mr. Franklin was not present. Puzak commented he has been attempting to meet the City's requirements <br />regarding sewer. Puzak requested the Council address the issues relating to setback and hardcover <br />tonight, with the sewer issue being deferred. <br />Franklin stated they have discussed the sewer issue within the past month and a half, with Mr. Puzak <br />• not informing him that he was considering building a new septic system. <br />PAGE 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.