My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-2001 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
09-10-2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2012 2:20:42 PM
Creation date
3/7/2012 2:20:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 <br />9. Storage of Boats on Residential Property —Ordinance 206, 2 "d Series -- Continued <br />• For lakeshore lots boats may be stored in lakeshore yard as long as they don't <br />significantly impact a neighbor's views of the lake. <br />• For non - lakeshore lots boats may be stored in side yard and rear yard meeting boat <br />setback requirements, and boats up to 20' long may be stored in a front yard driveway <br />meeting setback requirements during the months of May- September. <br />• Licensing, operability /restoration, and principal residence guidelines as per Planning <br />Commission recommendation. <br />• Complaints regarding a boat stored in the lakeshore yard and impacting a neighbor's <br />views of the lake will be referred to a dispute resolution committee consisting of the <br />Planning Director, the Building Official, and a member of the Planning & Zoning <br />Department staff. <br />Gaffron stated staff had not included any requirements as to who could or could not <br />complain in their recommendation, such as: the person complaining must be directly <br />affected by that which they are complaining about. So a person living 2 miles from a boat <br />stored in sight of passers -by could not complain. He suggested Council might consider <br />such a proposal. Council was handed a copy of Minnetonka's ordinance, which does <br />• include a statement about who can complain. <br />lie stated that the ordinance before them reflected staff's recommendations, not the <br />Planning Commission's. <br />Sansevere stated that he felt any citizen has a right to complain about a situation. He was <br />in favor of the grandfathering clause and approved a more lenient ordinance. <br />Flint stated he was interested in the Minnetonka ordinance, but was not ready to adopt such <br />a restriction. Overall, he preferred flexibility and letting citizens police each other. He <br />approved of the staff recommendations. <br />Sansevere stated he is concerned that a boat too big to trailer could be improperly blocked <br />and topple, injuring someone or damaging property. Gaffron stated that there are no <br />requirements regarding blocking, but the City could require blocks be inspected. <br />Rich Anderson of 3205 Crystal Bay Road stated that usually the maximum size of a <br />trailered boat is 27'. He owns North Shore Marina and stated even he would not approve <br />someone's blocking because the ground changes with the spring thaw and something <br />secure in winter could fail in the spring. <br />• Gary Welsh of 1214 Wildhurst Trail stated that boat owners would typically be careful <br />about blocking their boats because of the expense of the boat. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.