Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, AUGUST 13, 2001 <br />• Z Use of Funds from the Community Investment Fund — Continued <br />Mayor Peterson moved, and Sansevere seconded, to table Item 2. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Item 2 is continued after Item 14. <br />3. Presentation of the.City's 2000 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report <br />Ken Malloy, Auditor for the City, presented the 2000 Comprehensive Annual Financial <br />Report. Tom Kuehn, City Finance Director, was present to help answer questions. Malloy <br />stated that he had been an audit partner in the City's independent audit firm for the last 10 <br />years. His job was to review the City's financial records and statements and give an <br />opinion as to whether the financial statements were accurately stated. They also function <br />as a watchdog for the state to make sure the City was in compliance with state statutes. <br />The City's financial statements were accurate, with only a few findings. One finding <br />concerned contracts. Previously a number of requirements had to be met for contracts <br />over $25,000. The state recently changed that to over $50,000 for a city the size of Orono. <br />The City had a contract they thought was in compliance, but was actually awarded before <br />the new law went into effect. Malloy did write up the finding, but felt there would be no <br />consequence. <br />IS Another finding involved a broker the City dealt with, who did not return the broker <br />certificate form to the City for filing. <br />0 <br />Malloy indicated that the state will be taking over the General Education Levy portion of <br />property taxes. They will pay that for the school, but will also cut aids to municipalities. <br />The change is supposed to be neutral in terms of how it will affect the City. What the City <br />loses in state aid should be generated by additional taxes and more local government aid. <br />Property tax payers should receive the benefit. <br />Malloy discussed how Orono City revenues compare to other cities. The General <br />Operations levy generated a little less revenue than state wide averages through 1998, <br />which means Orono needs to generate less per capita than other cities, or that Orono <br />spends less, or that Orono finds other revenue sources. The tax rate is used as a <br />benchmark to see how heavy a burden the city places on its residents. Orono's tax rate is <br />14.8, while other cities averaged 29.6 in 2000. The General Fund balance and cash <br />balance dropped in 2000, but it was a planned drop for the purchase of land. The cash and <br />fund balances were both at $1.7 million, which Malloy characterized as a good, healthy <br />balance. The City has healthy water and sewer funds. Traditionally, Orono receives very <br />little funding from the state, and all of it is in homestead credit. Other sources of revenue <br />are taxes and charges for services that are specifically attributed to the person using the <br />service. The municipal golf course provides a small source of revenue. The new <br />2 <br />