Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 23, 2001 <br />(Long Lake Fire Station Settlement Agreement, Continued) <br />Tom Barrett, City Attorney, stated the letter from Mn/DOT identifies the amount of money available for <br />soft costs. Barrett stated he would prefer the actual dollar amount be included in the settlement <br />agreement. <br />Flint noted this letter from Mn/DOT is the only piece of paper the City has received specifying the <br />amount they are willing to pay for the fire station. Flint recommended the City accept that letter from <br />Mn /DOT. <br />Sansevere stated he is merely asking whether it should be incorporated into the settlement agreement or <br />be made as an addendum to the agreement. <br />Barrett suggested Orono notify Long Lake that Mn /DOT has made a counter offer and that this offer <br />should be incorporated into the settlement agreement. <br />Jabbour noted the basic language of the document would remain the same and that only the amount <br />would change. Jabbour commented the City of Long Lake may not accept the settlement amount being <br />proposed by Mn /DOT because they feel they are not being treated fairly as it relates to the public works <br />department and the city hall. Jabbour stated he was informed by Long Lake's City Administrator that <br />they would prefer the agreement not be changed. <br />• Sansevere commented Long Lake's public works building and city hall should be treated as a separate <br />issue. <br />Jabbour stated if Long Lake does not accept the settlement amount being proposed by Mn /DOT, the <br />entire agreement may be in jeopardy. <br />White stated the Council is merely looking to incorporate the new number into the settlement <br />agreement. <br />Sansevere commented he is concerned that if Long Lake does not accept this settlement proposal, that <br />the City of Orono may not receive anything from Mn /DOT for their portion of the fire station. <br />Sansevere stated in his view he does not see a valid reason why Long Lake would not accept this <br />proposal. <br />White noted the deadline to accept this proposal is August 1s` <br />Sansevere stated in his view this proposal is in the best interests of both cities and should be accepted. <br />Mayor Peterson recommended if this proposal is not accepted by Long Lake by the August I` deadline, <br />the City of Orono pursue other options for fire protection. <br />Flint suggested the language found on page eight relating to the escrow account be amended to read <br />as follows: "in the event the entire escrow account balance is not required for the replacement fire <br />station, the balance shall be owned 50 percent by Long Lake and 50 percent by Orono." Flint <br />• recommended the language "and shall be used to fund future capital improvements" be deleted from the <br />PAGE 11 <br />