My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-2001 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
07-09-2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2012 1:52:18 PM
Creation date
3/7/2012 1:52:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JULY 9, 2001 <br />( #01 -2686 Suzanne and Terry Johnson, Continued) <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval of the application with the <br />understanding that hardcover in the 75 - 250' setback area would be limited to 50 %, <br />reducing it by 220 s.f. from the plan presented. The applicants reduced hardcover by <br />removing a portion of the driveway and existing walkways. The Planning Commission <br />agreed the hardcover and structural coverage were consistent with the other properties in <br />the neighborhood. <br />Mr. Johnson stated that he has worked with the City to minimize hardcover. <br />Nygard stated that he would have trouble approving an increase in hardcover on the <br />property. Mr. Johnson stated that there would be an overall reduction to the hardcover, and <br />they were trying to create a parking area because there is no on- street parking by their <br />house. He stated they also get plowed into their driveway in the winters. <br />Sansevere asked what the Planning Commission found as the hardship. Mabusth stated <br />they did not want the Johnson's to have to back out onto the street, the size of the lot was <br />substandard in a 1 -acre zone, and that the improvements would be in line with the <br />neighbor's homes. Bottenberg stated that the Johnson's had reduced their hardcover by <br />• 220 s.f., and that the hardship was due to lot size and topography. Mr. Johnson stated that <br />they had very little hardcover in the 0 - 75' zone. Nygard suggested placing a covenant on <br />the property to limit the size of the house. Mr. Johnson stated that he did not want to do a <br />tear down, but would enclose an existing screened porch and the only demolition would be <br />to 8' of the garage. He also stated that they would remove a paved area on the side of the <br />house and the front sidewalk. <br />0 <br />Mayor Peterson stated she had a problem with the applicant increasing the amount of <br />structural coverage on the property. Moorse and Gaffron stated they had not seen a true <br />hardship in the application. <br />Flint moved, and White seconded, to adopt a resolution granting variances to <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14(C) to allow 2,195 s.f. (21.6 %) <br />structural lot coverage where 1,792 s.f. (17.7 %) exists and 1,519 s.f. (15 %) is allowed, <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)(2) to allow 3,548 <br />s.f. (50 %) hardcover in the 75 - 250' lakeshore setback where 4,302.9 s.f. (60.7 %) <br />exists and 1,772.5 s.f. (25 %) is allowed, Section 10.24, Subdivision 5(B) to allow side <br />yard setbacks of 6.6' for an entryway addition where 10' is required, 5' for a garage <br />addition where 10' is required, and a rear yard setback of 8.8' and 14.6' for a garage <br />addition where 35' is required and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and Section 10.56, <br />Subdivision 16(C)(6) to allow encroachment of 20' and 32' into the average lakeshore <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.