My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-2001 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
06-25-2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2012 1:50:27 PM
Creation date
3/7/2012 1:50:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />October June 25, 2001 <br />• <br />(Long Lake /Orono Fire Station, Continued) <br />Moorse stated the definition of good cause would be included under Item F on page nine and includes <br />the proposed language proposed by Orono. <br />Flint suggested they go with 24 months as kind of a compromise, with the definition of good cause <br />being included in the agreement. <br />Persian commented in his view 24 months is really not that long of a period of time to resolve any <br />disputes. <br />Murphy stated should the City ever decide to cancel this agreement and have their own fire station, it <br />would take them longer than two years to create a fire department. <br />Sansevere stated he does not have a problem with the language proposed by Long Lake. <br />Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to amend Clause F on Page Nine of the Settlement Agreement <br />to read as follows: 1) For good cause by any city that desires to terminate its participation in <br />the new fire services agreement, provided that such termination is preceded by a minimum of <br />24 months notice. <br />Nygard stated he has a concern that the 24 months may not be sufficient. <br />Barrett stated either city would need to demonstrate good cause for terminating the agreement, with all is <br />cities reaching a mutual agreement. <br />The City Council tabled any action on this motion. <br />(Recess taken from 10:26 p.m. —10:32 p.m.). <br />Contract for Joint Ownership <br />Section 5.d — Joint Committee <br />Barrett stated in his opinion the cities should avoid creating partnerships and other committees to <br />make final decisions and that the final decisions should be made by the two cities. Barrett stated <br />included in the Fire Protection Agreement there is language regarding a committee which is set up <br />for reviewing the budget. Section 5.d as proposed by Long Lake establishes a joint committee to <br />oversee the operations and maintenance of the Replacement Fire Station. Barrett stated this committee <br />would have ultimate responsibility for these items. Barrett recommended the City Council continue to <br />have final authority on these items. <br />Moorse stated it is his understanding the joint committee that is being addressed in this provision is the <br />joint construction committee, with that same committee continuing to operate after the building is <br />constructed. Moorse stated there would be a joint advisory committee composed of representatives <br />• <br />PAGE 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.