My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-29-2001 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
05-29-2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2012 1:18:18 PM
Creation date
3/7/2012 1:18:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />May 29, 2001 <br />• <br />( #01 -2687 CPV Development, Final Plat of Kokesh Farm, Continued) <br />Weinberger stated the wells to his understanding in this area are about 300 feet down, and he is <br />unsure what the long -term environmental affect would be. <br />Sansevere commented that this might be an area where a trail is not appropriate. Sansevere stated <br />he had the understanding when he reviewed the area that the fence line was right on the property <br />line or right next to it, which appears to be incorrect. Sansevere stated it would not be feasible to <br />put a trail along Orchard Park due to the closeness of the homes to the road in that area. <br />Alshouse concurred that a trail in this area is not appropriate. <br />White stated he has a concern regarding the removal of the tree line in this area. White <br />commented a trail in this area does not appear to make sense and that there are too many <br />impediments to overcome in order to construct a trail. <br />Nygard inquired whether the findings from the Watershed District were okay. <br />Weinberger stated they are, but questioned when the City would receive the mylars from the <br />County. <br />Alshouse stated the County has reviewed them and would get them back to us within a couple of <br />days. Alshouse stated he cannot file those since the City needs to have them, and requested that <br />final plat approval be given subject to all necessary documents being submitted to the City. <br />Flint stated if a north/south trail is not going to work, he would like to go back to what was <br />discussed on April 91h, which would just be a trail along the south side. Flint noted the trail would <br />not be constructed at this time since it does not go anywhere but the Park Commission could bank <br />the land for the future. Flint stated in many cases a trail cannot be envisioned until the whole <br />thing is there. Flint stated if Alshouse would be willing to move the trail over on the west side of <br />the property, very few trees would need to be removed. Flint stated a 12 foot easement would be <br />given to the City with no trail being constructed at this time. <br />Alshouse stated he would prefer not to have a trail on either side. Alshouse stated a 12 foot trail <br />easement would affect the neighbors' homes that are located close to the road. <br />Flint moved, White seconded, to approve and adopt a Resolution approving the final plat of <br />Kokesh Farm, subject to receipt of the mylars, approval by the Minnehaha Watershed <br />District, and a 12 foot trail easement along Watertown Road. <br />Sansevere stated he would encourage this Council or future Councils not to allow horses on the <br />trail if one is constructed along Watertown Road in order to limit the size of the trail. Sansevere <br />stated he would limit the use of this trail due to the closeness of the homes in this area to the trail. <br />Sansevere questioned whether it would be more appropriate to take a park dedication fee in this <br />instance in order to help fund the proposed improvements at the other parks. <br />McDermott noted the Park Commission did recommend a mix of cash and land in this case <br />• <br />PAGE 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.