Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, APRIL 9, 2001 <br />• 6. #01 -2663 CPV Development Company, LLC., 4100 Watertown Road and 505 <br />Orchard Park Road —Class III Preliminary Subdivision — Resolution <br />No. 4642 <br />Craig Alshouse was present representing CPV Development Company. <br />Weinberger stated that the applicant was requesting approval for a preliminary subdivision <br />of a 37 -acre parcel located at Watertown and Orchard Park Roads. Approximately 2 acres <br />of the property is classified as wetlands. Proposed is a 6 lot residential plat. Four lots <br />would be served by a private road. Proposed Lot 5 has access to Watertown Road and <br />contains the primary house, a horse barn and riding arena. Lot 6 has a house located on <br />the front property line and has access to Orchard Park Road. Both houses, the barn, and <br />riding arena are proposed to remain on the properties. The horse barn and riding arena are <br />Oversized Accessory Structures (OAS). The Planning Commission recommended the <br />arena and barn should be subject to a restrictive covenant that would limit the future use <br />or expansion of the buildings, limit their use to the keeping and raising of livestock and <br />storage of "horse farm" equipment, and no commercial use of the structures should be <br />permitted without a conditional use permit. <br />Approval would require the following variances: to permit 2 OAS where 1 is allowed, to <br />permit 2 OAS larger than the 3,000 s.f. maximum, to permit 14,497 s.f. for all accessory <br />buildings where 6,000 is allowed. Also, a variance would be required for the lot width of <br />is Lot 2, which fronts a cul de sac and does not meet the minimum 300' lot width for <br />properties in the RR -1A zoning district. <br />0 <br />Sansevere questioned the size of the horse barn versus the number of horses that would be <br />allowed on the lot. Mr. Alshouse stated that they would not put more horses on lot 5 than <br />allowed for that acreage. If the owner of lot 1 kept a horse on lot 1, they might use the <br />trail easement to access lot 5 and use the riding arena at the owner of lot 5's discretion. <br />Mr. Alshouse stated that they want to develop the land with a mind to preserving the <br />wetland and maintaining rural charm by keeping the barn and arena. He stated that the <br />barn is in very good condition and he has an interested buyer who would improve the <br />barn. <br />Flint questioned whether the Park Commission had looked at the application to consider <br />building a trail from Watertown to Stubbs Bay Road. McDermott stated there was <br />potential for a trail from Stubbs Bay Road to County Road 6. The Council discussed <br />difficulties with the topography of the land. Flint suggested the Parks Commission look at <br />the proposed development and consider the possibility of a trail. <br />Weinberger stated that on page 4 of 12 in the Resolution, item 17 refers to "the property <br />lines between Lots 1, 4 and 6," and should read "the property lines between lots 3, 4 <br />and 6." On page 7 of 12, item 15 refers to "uses accessory to a horse farm," and should <br />5 <br />