My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-2001 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
02-26-2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 4:28:16 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 4:28:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />February 26, 2001 <br />• <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*( #4) #2450 GLENN AND SANDRA GRONBERG, 325 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH — <br />EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL — RESOLUTION NO. 4610 <br />Sansevere moved, White seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4610, <br />a Resolution Granting an Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval for a Plat Proposed at <br />325 Willow Drive North. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />( #5) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH — <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT — DENIAL RESOLUTION NO. 4611 <br />Charles Van Eeckhout, Applicant, was present. <br />Weinberger stated the primary unresolved issue with this application is access to the property. <br />Weinberger indicated the review period expires at the end of the month and will need to be <br />extended if the Applicant intends to pursue this application. Weinberger stated he has a letter <br />available tonight for the Applicant's signature extending the time period. <br />Weinberger stated a resolution denying preliminary plat is before the City Council tonight. <br />Van Eeckhout stated he has not made any new progress on securing access to this development. <br />The Planning Commission indicated at their last meeting they did not wish to discuss this . <br />application any further. Van Eeckhout stated he has spoken with the Long Lake Planning <br />Commission who indicated in their view there is not a positive response by the residents on that <br />street to have access off of Apple Glen Road due to the added traffic that would result. Van <br />Eeckhout commented Apple Glen is a public road and in his view he has a legal right to have <br />access off of Apple Glen if he so desires since other people in the past have been granted access <br />off of this road. <br />Van Eeckhout stated in his opinion a denial resolution is not the best way to handle this matter <br />and other options should be explored. Van Eeckhout stated in his view the time limit is a non - <br />issue since there was one occasion in the past where the time limit expired. <br />Van Eeckhout stated the application before the Council tonight proposes to construct seven lots <br />with access off Apple Glen Road. Van Eeckhout stated the only reason for denial contained in <br />the resolution is the lack of access, and in his opinion he is legally entitled to this access if he <br />wishes to pursue it. Van Eeckhout stated the City in essence is telling him that he is not entitled <br />to access off Apple Glen, which is inconsistent in his view. Van Eeckhout noted he would prefer <br />access to be off of Brown Road, but was told on December I Vh by the City that they would <br />accept access off of Apple Glen, which was later rescinded at their January meeting. Van <br />Eeckhout stated that decision by the City hurt his negotiations with John Dunn on securing access <br />into this development. <br />Sansevere stated he does not agree with Van Eeckhout's statement. <br />Mayor Peterson indicated she also does not agree with that version. <br />PAGE 8 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.