My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2000 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
12-11-2000 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 4:05:25 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 4:05:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting <br />December 11, 2000 <br />10 <br />14. #264012641 Orono Ambar, LLC, 2060 Wayzata Boulevard —P. U.D./ • <br />Subdivision/Rezoning /Commercial Site Plan Reviews — Continued <br />proposed east parcel). The intended uses of the properties are a 2 and 3 -story 62 unit <br />senior housing project and a 23,000 s.£ office building. <br />Weinberger explained that since the last public meeting, the developer had changed the <br />plan by sliding the building further to the south, creating a 56 foot setback between the <br />building and rear property line. He had also lowered one half of the building by 7 feet. <br />He removed the third story on the eastern third of the building. Mr. Dunbar moved the <br />service road and rearranged the parking so that traffic wouldn't have to pass directly <br />through the lot, also parking along the south side of the road had been removed. The <br />service road would continue on to the office parking, and through to the property line in <br />order to allow future access to Brimhall Road. <br />Mayor Jabbour asked Mr. Dunbar to summarize the project's history. He stated that he <br />came in over the summer with a concept to put retail on the first floor and senior housing <br />above it. The proposed building was too high, so he broke the project apart offering a <br />retail /office site separate from the housing site. He tried to preserve a hill between the <br />two sites, thereby preserving vegetation. To minimize the impact on the neighbors to the <br />north, he moved the housing to the south and has reduced the parking. He lowered the <br />height on the northeast wing to 2 stories, reducing the housing to 62 units. He also <br />shortened the clock tower. He moved the office building 5 feet to the west and adjusted. <br />the elevator to eliminate variances. He raised the foundation of the senior housing 4 feet • <br />on the east side to keep the natural vegetation and moved the garage entrance to the south <br />side so neighbors on the east wouldn't see cars coming and going from the garage. He <br />chose similar building materials for the housing unit and the office building so they will <br />be compatible. <br />Dr. Berg, of 2021 Sugarwoods Drive, stated that the homeowners association has <br />discussed the project, and they approve of the senior housing. They are concerned that <br />the project is too big and too dense with about 17 people per acre. He submitted a <br />petition stating that the neighbors feel the project is too big. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated that the housing project needs enough density to justify the <br />expense. Orono as a community needs senior housing. He asked the neighbors to realize <br />that if the site is developed non - residential the parking requirements would eliminate all <br />existing trees on the site. He asked the neighbors to offer suggestions instead of simply <br />stating their complaints. Sansevere reminded the neighbors that Mr. Dunbar dropped his <br />housing plan from 70 to 62 units and dropped one wing from 3 to 2 stories in order to <br />accommodate the neighbors. <br />Ron Glover, of 2004 Sugarwoods Drive, asked if there was a solution to be found <br />between the existing plan and the worst possible scenario. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated that a housing project will produce minimal traffic and parking <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.