Laserfiche WebLink
. _. <br />0 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />October 23, 2000 <br />*( #11) #2620 PAUL PUSCUZZI, 3320 NAVARRE LANE — AFTER -THE -FACT <br />VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 4548 <br />Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4548, a <br />Resolution approving a variance to allow placement of an accessory structure between the <br />principal building and the front lot line where no accessory structures are normally <br />allowed and 15 feet from the front lot line where 30 feet is required for the property located <br />at 3320 Navarre Lane. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />*( #12) #2621 JAMES BARTH, 3725 TOGO ROAD — PRELIMINARY PLAT — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 4549 <br />Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4549, a <br />Resolution approving preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined in the Resolution. <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />*( #13) #2624 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD — RENEWAL VARIANCES — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 4550 <br />Flint moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4550, a <br />Resolution granting renewal of variances to allow the remodeling and expansion of the <br />• existing residence to include a four stall garage and additional living space for property <br />located at 815 Partenwood Road, subject to the conditions outlined in the resolution. <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />�J <br />( #14) WILLMAR THORKELSON, 440 BIG ISLAND, AFTER- THE -FACT VARIANCE <br />Mrs. Willmar Thorkelson and John Waldron, Attorney -at -Law, were present. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants have requested an after - the -fact variance to permit a <br />12' by 24' storage shed to remain on this property located on Big Island. The shed is currently <br />located 23 feet from a platted, dedicated right -of -way where 30 feet is required. <br />The Planning Commission voted 3 to 3 on a motion to recommend denial of the variance*to <br />permit the storage shed to remain on the property. It was the opinion of the Planning Commission <br />members favoring denial that permitting the storage shed to remain would set a negative precedent. <br />The Planning Commission members would not have voted for the plan as is, but would favor the <br />"size of the shed be decreased or moved to meet the required setback. <br />It was the opinion of the Planning Commission members favoring variance approval that permitting <br />the storage shed to remain was acceptable because only a small portion of the storage shed was in <br />the setback. The platted, dedicated right -of -way is not and is not intended to be developed street <br />within Big Island and because the building is in the most appropriate location on the lot because of <br />the topography. <br />PAGE 7 <br />