Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2000 <br />S. #2604 James Anderst, 3380 Shoreline Drive — Commercial Site Plan Review and <br />Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 4530— Continued <br />against the applicant. The City reserves the right to review the conditional use <br />permit on an annual basis. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*6. #2608 Philip and Karen Skoog, 280 Tonka Avenue — Variance Resolution No. <br />4531 <br />Kelley moved, and Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4531 granting a <br />variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section10.27, Subdivision 5(B) to allow a rear <br />yard setback of 39 feet where 50 feet is required and to allow a front yard setback of <br />43 feet where 50 feet is required. <br />Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />*7. #2609 Alan and Maxine Opheim, 1985 Fagerness Point Road — Variance <br />Resolution No. 4532 <br />Kelley moved, and Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4532 granting a <br />. variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to allow <br />construction of a porch on an existing concrete slab located 6.9 feet from the side <br />yard lot line where 10 feet is required and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) and <br />Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6) to allow the porch to encroach 73 feet into the <br />average lakeshore setback. <br />Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />40 <br />8. #2610 Jerome J. Hall, 80 Leaf Street — After - the -Fact Variances <br />Kelley stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of the plan they <br />reviewed. A revised plan came to the Council without benefit of the Planning <br />Commission reviewing it. He stated he would like to deny the application, or send it <br />back to the Planning Commission for their review. Flint and Peterson agreed. Mayor <br />Jabbour explained the situation to the applicant. Weinberger stated he could appear on <br />the Planning Commission's agenda on October 16, 2000, and that he had already had a <br />public hearing. <br />Peterson moved, and Flint seconded, to send the application back to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays b. <br />5 <br />