Laserfiche WebLink
, - ,--- _� <br />�_ - - � ° � Cit of ORONO �. <br /> � <br /> • R�SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � � <br /> -... - j(� N0, , 2461 <br /> '_• - • • ` __ <br /> B) The plantings along the shared lot line on the north side <br /> tend to lessen the impact of the structure by providing natural <br /> screening. <br /> -� - C) The viewing windows for the residence to the south of the <br /> -- property are angled away from the structure facing to the south <br /> and as a result, the deck structure provides no visual impact for <br /> the residence. <br /> D) Both effected property owners have submitted letters <br /> approving the sub�ect structure. <br /> -- E) The west half of the property that contains the majority of <br /> - hardcover drains away from the lake and towards Bohns Point Road. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the <br /> -- findings and-recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by <br /> City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br /> - variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> • 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br /> • property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not <br /> adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> v_ convenience_.to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon- <br /> strable hardship or� difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> - property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the <br /> spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of . the <br /> -- City. - <br />--- -- - CONCL�TSIONS, ORDER AND COA�DITIONS <br />:- � Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono <br /> - City Council hereby grants After-the-Fact variances to Municipal Zoning <br /> Code Section 10.22, Subdivisian 1 (B) and Section 10.22, Subclivision 2 to <br /> allow the existing lakeshore deck to remain as constructed without any <br /> alterations, subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. Applicant must remove specif�ic areas of existing hardcover as set <br /> _ __forth in the survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated 6/22/87, revised date <br /> � - 6/15/88 setting forth the following removals: <br /> ; - - - <br /> A. 0-75 ' setback area 199 s.f. or 2.65 $ to be removed , <br /> resulting in a total hardcover of 267 s.f. or 3.56$. r <br /> ; • B. 75-250' setback area 489 s.f. or 2.79& to be removed, <br />::� resulting in a total hardcover of 4,637 s.f. or 26.4$. <br /> '.� -- - <br />�— -- - -- -- - Page 2 of 4 <br /> _�. <br />_ _ , __ <br /> y�_ . - __- ._..-,.+-t_'_ _ - -= Y <br /> .� t• <br />,._- _ _ -. � t <br />