My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2458
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2400 - 2499 (March 28, 1988 - September 12, 1988)
>
Resolution 2458
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2016 3:11:21 PM
Creation date
6/23/2016 3:11:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
: i <br /> s <br /> . d Cit of ORONO <br /> 3 • , , . <br /> � <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2458 <br /> � • � • • . ' <br /> : <br /> � <br /> � <br /> , <br /> � <br /> :� <br />;r . <br />- NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of <br /> � Orono, Minnesota: <br /> , <br /> ' � FINDINGS <br /> l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File �1276 . <br /> .„ 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Rural Residential <br /> � Zoning District requiring 2 acres in area. The total area of <br /> the property is 71,482 square feet or 1.64 acres. <br /> : 3. On June 6, 1988 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed <br /> , the application as proposed based on the following findings: <br /> x • A. The proposed alterations will provide better <br /> � circulation and access within the sales area. <br /> � . B. The proposed interior alterations will not result <br /> in an increase of c.ommercial floor area, but merely <br /> • involves the redesignation of use areas. <br /> C. The proposed alternations and expansion of food <br /> services not considered an intensification of the <br /> existing non-conforming use. <br /> D. The City has received no negative comments from the <br /> surrounding property owners notified during the review <br /> of this application. <br /> E. The City has never received complaints concerning <br /> . the operation by the previous leasee unc3er the <br /> restrictive standards setforth in the previous <br /> - resolutions that govern the use of the property. <br /> � 4 . The City Council has considered this application <br /> ' including the findings and recommendations of the Planning <br /> ' Commission, the reports by staff. and comments of the <br /> `• �applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, <br /> = safety and welfare of the community. �• <br />"� - <br /> � • <br /> � 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use <br /> permit to permit the proposed alterations within the <br /> principal structure and to approve the transfer of ownership <br /> to the applicant will not be detrimental to the health , <br /> .� Page 2 of 10 , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.