Laserfiche WebLink
:�,;...��d Cit o� ORONO <br /> � <br /> • �',;x�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ,, •,:� NO. 2427 <br /> .• � � • " . <br /> Y N--,�,,. <br /> ,.....,; <br /> a. Because the proposal is to remove the existing house from its <br /> foundation and store it on the property, the new foundation can <br /> be located so as to meet the required side setbacks and average <br /> lakeshore setbacks. <br /> b. There is no existing hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback <br /> zone. The proposed 35.3�5 hardcover in the 75-250' zone is <br /> necessary and reasonable to accomplish applicants redevelopment <br /> of his property with a house, detached garage, and minimum <br /> d�iveway area. The proposed hardcover variance is consistent <br /> with similar variances granted for other properties in the <br /> , neighborhood to accomplish similar property renovations. <br /> c. Baldur Park Road is a lightly travelled residential street, <br /> hence construction of a detached garage located 17' from the <br /> travelled roadway will not cause a safety hazard in the <br /> neighborhood but will provide parking area between the garage and <br /> the street. The existing garage to be removed is only 12' from <br /> the street, hence the proposal creates a safer situation than now <br /> • exists. <br /> d, Storage of the existing house in the 0-75' setback zone for a <br /> � limited period of time will have no detrimental effect on the <br /> environment nor on the neighborhood. <br /> e. There is no additional land available to make this a <br /> conforming lot. <br /> 4. After the Planning Commission review, applicant requested a 0.4' <br /> side setback variance for the house, noting that moving the house into <br /> the 0-75' zone will be cost prohibitive, and the existing f loor joist <br /> layout and existing utility connections would make the necessary 4"-6" <br /> sideways movement of the structure to meet the 10' side setback, not <br /> feasible. <br /> � <br /> 5. Similarly, the applicant subsequently revised his request to <br /> allow additional hardcover of 125 s.f. (1.7$) so that the garage could <br /> be placed 21' instead of 17' from the street lot line, leaving more <br /> parking room, and revising the proposed sidewalk between the house and <br /> garage to a width of 3' rather than 2' original ly proposed. <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the <br /> findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by <br /> City staf f, comments by the appl icant and the ef f ect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> • <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />