Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 24, 2000 <br />E <br />( 42549 David Lovelace, Continued) <br />barge out to Big Island was discussed, which met with good reception with the neighbors. Lovelace <br />requested assistance from City Staff on the proper process to follow in that regard. <br />Mayor Jabbour noted that the mainland enjoys City garbage collection, while Big Island does not. <br />Jabbour stated he would be willing as a private citizen to provide a site, a rolloff, and a garbage <br />barge on one side of the Island to help clean up Big Island. Jabbour noted that taxpayer dollars <br />cannot be used in this effort. <br />Lovelace commented he was not looking for taxpayer dollars to help clean up the Island but was <br />looking for access to a garbage barge. Lovelace indicated he would be willing to discuss this <br />further with the Mavor at another time. <br />*( 94) #2559 GILBERT GEHLE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES /CUP <br />Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Variances to Hardcover in the 75 -250' <br />Lakeshore Setback and Hardcover Within 75' of the South Lakeshore, and a Conditional <br />Use Permit to Permit Regrading and Restoration of the Site. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />( #5) 42563 MIKE AND RUTH FILBRANDT, 3960 BAVSIDE ROAD - SKETCH PLAN <br />REVIEW <br />Mike and Ruth Filbrandt, Applicants, were present. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting a sketch plan review for a 26 acre parcel which <br />consists of three tax parcels. The Applicants are interested in subdividing the properties to create <br />two buildable lots. The total acreage is approximately nine acres of dry buildable land, with the <br />minimum lot size being five acres in the RR -IA District. <br />This item appeared before the Planning Commission where several issues were discussed <br />relating to how the Applicants could appropriately subdivide the property. The Planning Commission <br />considered subdividing this property by doing a lot line rearrangement; however, City Code may not <br />necessarily apply in this case because they are generally looked at as Class I Subdivisions and a <br />Class I Subdivision does not allow any type of flexible zoning and would require ten acres of dry_ <br />buildable land in order to create two lots. Class I Subdivisions requiring flexible zoning have <br />traditionally only been used for lot line rearrangements between existing developed parcels. City <br />City Code prohibits selling off of the two smaller undeveloped lots without the principal larger lot <br />because it would create two non - conforming lots. <br />The Planning Commission had suggested that some consideration be given to rezoning the property from <br />the five acre minimum lot size to two acre minimum lot size. City Staff has brought this <br />matter before the City Council to give their thoughts on whether rezoning of this area would be • <br />