My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2000 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
02-14-2000 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2012 3:23:11 PM
Creation date
3/1/2012 3:23:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L! a <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2000 <br />0 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS — LIZ HAWN, REPRESENTATIVE <br />None. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />3. #2530 William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard — Variance — Resolution No. 4420 <br />Mr. Wear was not present, but was represented by his general manager. <br />The City Council had previously reviewed this application and tabled the request because the <br />overhead canopy was not in conformance with the approvals granted on a prior land use <br />application. The property owner has since replaced the lighting under the overhead canopy to <br />comply with the City requirement. • <br />The property was granted variances for allowed signage per Resolution No. 2073 that approved <br />573 s.f. as part of a Comprehensive Sign Plan. The Applicant has proposed a new sign plan that <br />would dedicate more signage to one use than was permitted by Resolution No. 2073. <br />The Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended the property be allowed <br />380 s.f. of signage, based on the use of the property as a shopping center. The site is zoned B- 1, <br />however, the use of the property for a number of years has been consistent with that of a property <br />in the B -3 district. If this lot was located in the B -3 district it would be allowed 380 s.f. of <br />signage. <br />The building is designed for each tenant to have exterior access. This requires each tenant to be <br />identified on the exterior of the building rather than the interior entrance associated with a <br />shopping center. <br />Sansevere stated the lights replaced under the canopy look much better than the lights originally <br />installed. <br />Flint questioned how the proposed sign they received in their packet was different from the new <br />proposal. <br />is <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.