Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
� <br /> TO: W. R. Benson, City Administrator <br /> FROM: Alan P. Olson, City Planner <br /> DATE : November 12 , 1982 <br /> SUBJECT: Phone Call Received Regarding Deering Island <br /> A Larry Schlossinger called me today saying he had talked to Mary <br /> Butler who referred him to me . <br /> He "has a chance to buy Deering Island" and would like to develop <br /> it with a summer-season restaurant . What does he need to get approval? <br /> I asked a lot of questions and he had few answers . He did not know <br /> size of facility, number of docks , where parking would be , etc. He <br /> said it would be a "high class" aesthetic development, which would <br /> add tax base , etc . He said they would be needing multiple docks <br /> (unknown how many) and would have a ferry service from an unknown <br /> parking lot location. They would have off-duty police and built-in <br /> fire protection. He did not want to spend a lot of money on plans <br /> etc , until he knew the City would approve . He would do it the <br /> way the City wants. <br /> My reply: Based on long-standing City policy, Comprehensive Plan and <br /> ordinances, including revisions of island zoning now being completed, <br /> Orono has discouraged development on the islands except for low <br /> density seasonal residential cabins, etc. He would be asking for <br /> something entirely new and contrary to past �olicies ; therefore , based <br /> on past precedent, I do not think his restaurant idea would be approved. <br /> But he has the right to present his ideas and make a case for how <br /> his restaurant would fit in. Orono always listens to new ideas . <br /> His would be an uphill battle and burden would be on him to convince <br /> Council to make necessary changes. He would be asking for : <br /> l . Comprehensive Plan amendment <br /> 2 . Rezoning from residential to commercial <br /> 3 . Plan approval based on detailed technical specifications <br /> Council could turn him down at any point. Council could not give <br /> final approval , and probably not even conceptual approval, until <br /> all questions were answered. <br />