My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2098
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2000 - 2099 (May 27, 1986 - December 23, 1986)
>
Resolution 2098
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2016 1:54:51 PM
Creation date
6/20/2016 1:54:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 .,' <br /> t <br /> c�t� o� oR,oNo <br /> • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2098 <br /> o - • � . <br /> A RESOLIITION GRANTING <br /> A CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT <br /> TO MiJNICIPAL ZONING CODl3 � <br /> SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 AND <br /> A VARIANCE TO <br /> MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.55, SQBDIVISION 8 <br /> FILE #1039 <br /> � WHEREAS, William J. U].rich (hereinafter "the applicant") is <br /> the owner of the property located at 1535 Bohn's Point Road within the <br /> City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legalYy described as Lot l, <br /> Beth and Bridget (hereinafter "property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 the applicant has <br /> made application to the City of Orono to permit the instalYation of an <br /> underground 4 inch pipe that would extend into the 0-75 foot lakeshore <br /> �; protected area and a variance per Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 land <br /> alterations are not permitted within the lakeshore protected area. <br /> NOW, THERI3FORE, B13 IT RESOLVED by the City Council_of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> -FINDINGS .. <br /> ' L This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1039. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Single Family°Lakeshore <br /> Residential �Zoning District. <br /> 3. The property is approximately 5 acres in area. <br /> 4. On August 18, 1986, the Planning Commission action resulted <br /> , in a split vote. <br /> 5. The approvimg members based their recommendation on the <br /> foYlowing findings: <br /> a) An underground pipe cannot be considered new hardcover <br /> within the protected area. <br /> � b) The applicant proposed appropriate erosion controY <br /> r � measures throughout the excavation project creating <br /> negligibYe impact on the lake. <br /> � c) The underground pipe wilY outlet into the protected <br /> � lagoon and not the main lake. <br /> `t ' Page 1 of 6 <br /> � . , <br /> . _ _ _ <br /> � _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.