Laserfiche WebLink
� ;• . . . <br /> ; l;�, . <br /> � Cit� o� ORONO <br /> � <br /> • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2078 <br /> • - • • <br /> A RESOLIITION GRANTING <br /> A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> � SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 <br /> FILE #1078 <br /> WH$REAS, John B. Massopust and Longridge Associates (herein- <br /> after "the appYicants") are the owners of the property located at and <br /> near 440 Brown Road South located within the City of Orono <br /> (hereinafter "City") and 1ega11y described as follows: <br /> Lot 3 , B1ock, ]:� Stronghold, Hennepin County, Minnesota; <br /> and � <br /> The following described property in Section 3, Township 117 <br /> North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian: <br /> Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the <br /> Southeast 1/4, then South 380 feet to a point 936.4 feet `North of <br /> • the Southeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4, <br /> then Westerly para11e1 with the South line thereof 456.05 feet, <br /> then deflecting 89 degrees 45. minutes to the left a distance <br /> 191.55 feet, then Westerly para11e1 with the South line of the <br /> Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 a distance 872.75 feet to a <br /> point in the west line thereof a distance 744.85 feet North from <br /> the Southwest corner thereof, then North 580 feet to the <br /> Northwest corner thereof, then East to the point of beginning, <br /> (hereinafter "property); and <br /> WH$R$AS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for <br /> a Conditional Use Permit to permit grading and excavation of a <br /> wild�ife pand per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R$SOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS , <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1078. <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Single Family Rural <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. On October 20, 1986, the Orono Planning Comm�.ssion reviewed <br /> the application as proposed and recommended approval, finding <br /> • that: <br /> A) The pond area in question is not a designated wetland. <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />