Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
. � � . <br /> . � , <br /> - j - � c�t� o�� oRONo <br /> ;.�.< < � _ <br /> �, <br /> • t � ���� � <br /> ;., ����; �RESOLUTION OF THE.CITY COUNCIL <br /> �. : <br /> ,,;.: � '� NO. 2087 . <br /> � .�����` <br /> � - • • <br /> �,:;� <br /> NOW, THEREFORL B$ IT R$SOLV?3D by the City Counci 1 of <br /> the City of Orono, Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This app�ication was reviewed as Zoning File #1064. � <br /> 2. The Yift station cover and control panel are located <br /> � above the surrounding ground surface. It is questionable <br /> whether the lift station and control panel fit under the <br /> def inition of a "bui lding", however, for purposes of this <br /> application and to avoid future disputes, these structures <br /> are considered buildings requiring a 50' setback from any <br /> • abutting lot Iines in the LR-lA Zoning District. <br /> 3. The lift station cover and control panel are located 14 <br /> feet from the nearest Yot line of residential property. The <br /> panel and lift station are located partially within the . <br /> property �ocated at 1960 Shoreline Drive which is zoned LR- <br /> lA but the use of which has historica�lg been, and is <br /> currently, commercial. <br /> 4. The City Engineer has submitted a proposed landscape plan <br /> which proposes screening of the lift station cover and • <br /> control panel using natural vegetation and plantings. <br /> 5. The Owner of the property located 14 feet from the Yift <br /> station and control panel has voiced objection to the <br /> exsitence of the structures in the present location. The <br /> owner of the property on which the lift station is located <br /> has voiced no objection to the Yocation. , <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the existing location of the <br /> lift station and control panel was predicated on economic <br /> and technical factors, and the location chosen was the best <br /> location given those factors. <br /> 7. The City Council finds that the hardship justifying the <br /> granting of a variance to the 50 foot setback requirement is <br /> • that there is no location within the service area of the <br /> Crystal Bay Se'wer Project in which it would have been <br /> economically feasible and technicaY Yy appropriate to place <br /> the lift station structure 50 feet from any abutting 1ot <br /> line. <br /> Page 2 of 4 , <br />