Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> c ' <br /> � :+ <br /> p'.ff. . <br /> ��. <br /> f � C�t� o� ORONO <br /> . <br /> tt:. � �� <br /> :� �- <br /> ^�. <br /> • 'I��°��-��� Y RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 4 <br /> ,t, �1. <br /> 'x �;�', , "'S. NO. 2065 <br /> ;��. }�, • <br /> :,.,_ <br /> . • _ ,. �: <br /> .i y.',�'.�f�T <br /> .�.�.A .�; �,�i.' <br /> C) The applicant's contractor removed a 72 s.f. concrete <br /> patio in the 0-75' setback zone and replaced it in the same <br /> general location with a 144 s.f. wooden deck in Spring 1986, <br /> without obtaining the necessary approvals or permits. The <br /> deck is located 25 ' from the lakeshore. The deck <br /> construction results in a net increase of 72 s.f. of 0-75' <br /> hardcover, or an increase to 11.50�. <br /> D) The applicant is requesting approval for a balcony <br /> extension on the second floor between existing balconies <br /> serving the master bedroom and screen porch, all within the <br /> 0-75' setback zones. The entire proposed balcony extention <br /> is above existing hardcover consisting of rock beds under- <br /> Yain by plastic, hence no increase from pre-existing hard- <br /> cover W�ii result from the proposed balcony. The balcony <br /> extention wi11 provide a secondary fire exit from the master <br /> Sbedroom. <br /> E) The property contains a large square footage of rock <br /> beds underlain by plastic in the 0-75' zone, from which the <br /> plastic can be removed to compensate for the increased deck <br /> hardcover. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the rock beds underlain by <br /> plastic within the property constitute excessive and unneccessary <br /> hardcover in an amount of approximately 2,375 s.f. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including <br /> the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br /> reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect <br /> of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the <br /> community. <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply genera�ly to� other <br /> property in this zoning district; that granting the variance <br /> would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would . <br /> not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br /> � applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br /> the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />