Laserfiche WebLink
.. ..�: <br /> .. ��������� C�t� o� ORONO <br /> ... �� ,. <br /> • � �1` RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> -����f-: <br /> �.�'�:i,,:. <br /> NO. 2058 <br /> • - � • �� <br /> A RRSOLOTION GRANTING <br /> VARIANCES PER <br /> MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.08, SIIBDIVISION 3 (A)7 <br /> AND TO SECTION 10.27, SQBDIVISION 5 (B) <br /> FILE �1065 <br /> WH$REAS, Larry Martineau (hereinafter "the applicant") is <br /> the owner of the property locat�d at 4360 Chippewa Lane within the <br /> City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 3, Block 1, Chippewa Third Addition, Hennepin County, <br /> Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WBEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br /> variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A)7 to <br /> permit the construction of a non-rental guest apartment within the <br /> basement level of the principal residence at 4360 Chippewa Lane. <br /> NOW, THERBFORE, BE IT RESOLV$D by the City Counci 1 of Orono, <br /> • Minnesota: � <br /> FINDINGS <br /> l. This application was reviewed as Zoning Fi1e #1065. <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-lA Single Family Rural <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> September 15, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed <br /> variance based upon the following findings: <br /> ' A) The applicants intend the apartment to be used as a <br /> guest apartment only and have no intent to rent the <br /> apartment. . <br /> B) The apartment, as designed, is on the walkout level of <br /> the house and may be accessed from within the main house as <br /> We1i as from direct exit to the rear yard at the walkout <br /> level, or indirectly to the garage. <br /> 4. This property was created by a subdivision approved prior to <br /> the adoption of the RR-lA zoning district standards. The lot <br /> technically has a width of 140' at the 100' front yard setback <br /> line, hence does not meet the required 300' width standard and <br /> technically required a variance to obtain a building permit. <br /> However, the lot is 964' wide at the building site and therefore <br /> at that point exceeds the required point. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including <br /> the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br /> • reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect <br /> of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the <br /> community. <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />