Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � _ . { . , ... . _ ..._ ,._ .....�.K,..,.,�_._.......,..._...._..._..__....._.�..w.._._... <br /> .- � ' ' .,� . iA'� . � ,�N � .s • • '� � <br /> ,. � F:/r� •�' . _ . t+ . .. .. <br /> � L l . <br /> . � =: �_ _ c�t _:o� oR,oNO - . .. � ,. <br /> � <br /> � • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL� <br /> _ Q� <br /> ` � NO. 2057 . <br /> � • - • • <br /> � . <br /> ' � A RESOI�UTION GRANTIAiG <br /> 4 <br /> VARIANCES TO <br /> •" MUNICIPAL ZONING COD$ <br /> �' SECTION 10.22, SIIBDIVISION 1 & 2 <br /> � AND SECTION 10.55, SIIBDIVISIOAT 8 <br /> FILE #1033 <br /> ,� WHERBAS, Royal J. Dossett (hereinafter "the applicant") is <br /> : the owner of the property located at 2795 Pheasant Road within the <br /> . City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legal ly described as follows: <br /> -a <br /> ' Lot 11, Block l, Pheasant Lawn, Hennepin County, Minnesota, <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and _ <br /> , , WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a • <br /> . variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 2 <br /> to permit the construction of a screen porch, deck, and patio which <br /> ' � constitue structure in the 0-75 foot lakeshore setback zone where no <br /> structure is normally allowed, and increasing hardcover in the 0-75' <br /> setback zone from 1$ to 5.5� where no hardcover is normally allowed, <br /> and increasing hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone from 26.4� to <br /> 27.2g where only 25$ hardcover� is normally allowed, and which will <br /> ` extend closer to the lake than the average distarice to the lake of the <br /> adjacent properties. . <br /> ; NOW, TH$REFORE, BE IT R$SOL`IED by the City Counci l of Orono, <br /> �. Minnesota: <br /> . <br /> FINDINGS <br /> - l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1033. <br /> � 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning Dist'rict. � <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> � May 19, 1986, and recommended partial approval of the proposed <br /> - variances based upon the following findings: <br /> � A) The screen porch as proposed will not encroach on •any <br /> � views enjoyed by the neighboring property owners. The <br /> neighboring property owners have expressed their support for <br /> the proposal. <br /> , • <br /> B) The majority of the drainage from the existing house <br /> : runs away from the lake and onto the 75-250' setback zone. <br /> If applicant maintains a gutter system directing roof <br /> drainage to the 75-250' setback zone, the only runoff moving <br /> directly toward the lake will be that generated in the 0-75' <br /> setback zone. <br /> Paae 1 of 4 <br />