My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/20/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
09/20/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:14:44 PM
Creation date
2/28/2012 12:14:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 20, 1993 <br />•ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: <br />Chair Charles Schroeder, Candace Rowlette, Charles Nolan Jr., Sandra Smith, Stephen <br />Peterson, Janice Berg, Dale Lindquist. The following represented the City Staff. Building & <br />Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, and Recorder Marva Hurst. Chair Schroeder called <br />the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br />(#1) #1862 THREE STAR TRUCKING <br />2590 WATERTOWN ROAD - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC <br />HEARING <br />The subdivision was reviewed as a sketch plan review at the July Planning Commission <br />meeting. The application involves a proposal within a rural residential district requiring on -site <br />septic testing and the assurance that there is two acres of dry buildable contiguous land within <br />each of the lots. Each lot, with the exception of lot 8, is proposed at the minimum two acre dry <br />contiguous with lot 4 having a .55 acre retention pond. Applicant' alternate plan shows an <br />extension to the west through the Halson's property. Applicant's surveyor has shown a dashed <br />line, where the 50 foot extension corridor would be located. Also, with the designation of the <br />road, lot Ts lot line is moved further east to assure enough dry contiguous. <br />• Mabusth noted the updated report from the engineer which should be reviewed during <br />discussion of grading and drainage issues because there are several unanswered issues regarding <br />the size of the retention pond in lot 4. Primary concern is that if the pond had to be increased <br />in size, where would the additional dry buildable area come from? The only available <br />additional dry buildable would come from lot 8. <br />Mr. Dunwreath Peasley, 95 Hackberry Hill, asked for clarification of lot locations and raised <br />concerns about draining to east lot line. <br />Chairman Schroeder read aloud the letter from the engineering firm Bonestroo, Rosene, <br />Anderlik & Associates, dated Sept. 12, 1993. <br />Schroeder asked Mabusth to clarify meaning of this letter. <br />Mabusth explained that she is not able to get an accurate sizing of the pond and that Mark <br />Gronberg would have comments and information to share regarding this issue. <br />Gronberg explained his conversation with Shawn Gustafson of Bonestroo et al. They reviewed <br />the numbers and the possible classifications for woods and pasture: good, fair, and poor. <br />Gustafson had classified both wood and pasture as fair but after review he was comfortable <br />with the numbers. They also determined that berm was actually higher than the high water <br />mark of retention pond. There will have to be some type of erosion control at the outlet of the <br />�J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.