My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Hearing Flag Lot Issues 08/18/93
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Public Hearing Flag Lot Issues 08/18/93
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:11:53 PM
Creation date
2/28/2012 12:11:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING ON FLAG LOT ISSUES <br />0 August 18, 1993 <br />lots. Schroeder thought one of the major issues was the change in measurement of lakeshore <br />lots and the ramifications of measuring from the front and back lot line. <br />Rowlette asked what the ramifications are of not changing the current measurements in <br />the Shoreland Regulations. Gaffron explained that anyone who wants to do a flag lot on the <br />lakeshore and meets the area requirements, doesn't have to meet the width at the street setback <br />and does not need a variance. Rowlette stated that if an ordinance were written with strict <br />enough standards, there would be no need to return to standards prior to the Shoreland <br />Regulations. Gaffron agreed. Rowlette stated an ordinance would need to be written that is <br />strict enough to meet all concerns or return to previous standards and she thinks the Planning <br />Commission should try to do this. <br />Schroeder would prefer recommending to the Council that they go back to the previous <br />way of calculating lot width and then work over the next 90 days to draft a new ordinance. <br />Rowlette felt the moratorium was already doing that. Nolan stated that if at the end of 90 days <br />the Planning Commission has not resolved the issue, then the recommendation could be given <br />to Council to return to previous calculations. Rowlette thought it wouldn't make any difference <br />which way the Planning Commission acted. Gaffron felt the Council should be informed of the <br />progress of the Planning Commission and will write a memo to Council. <br />isThe meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m. <br />is <br />G'! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.