Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 16, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1849 - CONT. <br />Mabusth added that a staff inspection would be done before final subdivision approval to see if <br />all the conditions had been met. <br />It was moved by Smith, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of Application #1849 for <br />the Estates of Barbara B. Lund and Russell T. Lund, III, 905 Tonkawa Road, as proposed and <br />allows for vacation of the sewer easement as indicated. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />( #') #1829 DIANE SIEFF, <br />1080 WELDHURST TRAIL - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF <br />PUBLIC HEARING - 8:21 TO 8:50 <br />Diane Sieff and Gerald Sieff, her son, were present. <br />Mabusth. explained the application had been tabled at the July 19th, meeting to provide Mrs. Sieff <br />time to consider additional hardcover removals. An amended application has been received <br />indicating the removal of 84 s.f. from the 0-75'. Sea walls or rip rap remain at 76 s.f. which <br />are not counted as hardcover in the 0 -75 setback area'. Based on policy, there is 0 s.f. of <br />hardcover within the 0 -75' area. In the 75 -250' setback area, the applicant proposes the removal <br />of plastic underliner beneath the rose bed planters in the lakeshore yard and cement pads. The <br />8'x20' new structure results in 160 s.f. of structural hardcover and applicant proposes removal <br />of nonstructural hardcover at 391.4 s.f. <br />Chair Schroeder asked applicant if additional hardcover could be removed in the driveway area? <br />Mrs. Sieff replied that part of the driveway is shared by her neighbor during bad weather. <br />Chair Schroeder questioned the possibility of driveway reduction in the area closer to the <br />attached garage. <br />Mabusth asked if it could be reduced where the doors meet? <br />Mrs. Sieff did not agree. <br />Chair Schroeder stated the removal of plastic underliner is a good step but is difficult to count <br />as a reduction. <br />Mrs. Sieff asked if nonstructural hardcover is counted against her in the hardcover study, why <br />can't it be counted as a removal? <br />