My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/19/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
04/19/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:09:25 PM
Creation date
2/28/2012 12:09:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 19, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1816 - CONT. <br />Mrs. Swanson said they had hoped the Commission would view the <br />removal of the lakeside deck as such. She added they will also be <br />removing a corner of the house. She clarified that she has 5 <br />children and would not want to remove the play structure. <br />Peterson asked if the neighbor to the left objected as his views <br />would be cut off. <br />Mrs. Swanson noted that both adjacent residences are much taller, <br />and stated the neighbor has views of their drive, but this proposal <br />would not affect their front views of the lake. <br />It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Johnson, to recommend <br />approval of Application #1816 for Kent and Susan Swanson, 3229 B <br />Casco Circle, for hardcover and setback variances to construct <br />additions to their existing residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />• ( #14) #1817 THOMAS F. JOHNSON, <br />2795 SHADYWOOD ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 9:30 - 9:40 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. Johnson was present. <br />Mabusth indicated that Mr. Johnson was unaware of the easement <br />situation and just prior to the meeting had requested tabling the <br />application, but staff suggested the Planning Commission discuss <br />the merits of the proposal and provide direction on an amended <br />proposal <br />Bellows questioned the location of the garage between the shed and <br />the bridge. She felt this location may not be feasible. <br />Johnson stated they would need to excavate the hill to accommodate <br />the garage. <br />Schroeder questioned the need for the cul -de -sac. <br />Mabusth noted it would serve at least four properties. She <br />indicated a former owner attempted to get the private easement <br />released, but upon the recommendation of his attorney, the easement <br />was maintained for future needs. <br />• Bellows expressed concern about releasing the easement. She felt <br />they should ask the engineer to comment on the need and size of the <br />cul -de -sac. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).