My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/21/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
06/21/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:08:15 PM
Creation date
2/28/2012 12:08:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21, 1993 <br />KENNETH FIGGE, 2004 SUGARWOOD DR - CONT. <br />Peterson stated this may help water move faster to the Gill <br />residence to the east. <br />Nolan felt if the filling were allowed, it may help to creating <br />ponding on the property to the west. <br />Mark stated the area to be filled is a pothole. <br />Nolan stated he would be more interested in a permanent solution. <br />Mark answered to make a gu I I y through the trees to get to the swal e <br />area, they need to fill this pothole. <br />Lindquist stated he is not comfortable with anything but a <br />permanent solution. <br />Mabusth noted the property owners /developers have indicated they <br />intend to seek approval of a conditional use permit in the near <br />future to implement a more comprehensive plan to solve the drainage <br />concerns. <br />Peterson polled the Commission and all were interested in a long- <br />term solution. <br />Rowlette referred to the handout explaining the covenants to <br />builders. Condition #3 refers to "landscaping structures ", and she <br />stated they must define this term. She noted major discussion <br />during the PUD process in developing the covenants. <br />Mitchell stated no one dreamed that sidewalks would be prohibited <br />as the covenant is largely negative and it does not prohibit <br />sidewalks. He added most residences have sidewalks to their front <br />door. <br />Nolan asked the builder if he would consider the removal of the <br />half circle shaped structure at the end of the sidewalk. He agreed <br />there is natural opening for the sidewalk and there appears to be <br />a need to provide a walk to the front door. <br />Mark stated the half circle structure was only provided for <br />aesthetics and ties in with the other development on the property. <br />He felt the walk fits in with the style of the home. <br />• It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend <br />approval of the request from Kenneth Figge, 2004 Sugarwood Drive, <br />to install a 12' wide curved drive. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.