Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1823 - CONT. <br />Nolan voted nay because he felt they were creating a situation <br />encouraging further abuse. <br />Rowlette voted nay because she felt the deck should have been <br />included in the original review. <br />( #13) KENNETH FIGGE, <br />2004 SUGARWOOD DRIVE - REQUEST TO VARY FROM COVENANTS <br />Kenneth Figge, Robert Mitchell, Mark Larames, L. Kramer and Sid <br />Rebers were present. <br />Mabusth explained this request includes interpretation of the <br />covenants with respect to the curved drive, the pedestrian walkway <br />and filling in a protected /non - clustered area. <br />Larames, the landscape architect, explained the drive is proposed <br />. at 12' width to meander to the autoport , a l l within the allowed 20' <br />access corridor. <br />Mitchell pointed out the intent of the covenant with respect to <br />drives was to prevent drives from crossing the entire front yard. <br />Mark stated the sidewalk was designed assuming walks were <br />permitted. He stated there is a natural opening which meanders to <br />the front door and would facilitate on- street parking. He felt it <br />made sense to have a walk to the front door. <br />Lindquist noted all other properties in the development use the <br />drive to gain access to the front door. <br />Mitchell pointed out on- street parking is allowed in the <br />development. He added the covenants are specific in what they <br />prohibit and sidewalks were not prohibited. <br />Nolan stated they may not prohibit sidewalks, but does prohibit <br />grading in the front yard. <br />Mabusth pointed out the covenant does state that only a 20' wide <br />access corridor is allowed within the front street yard. <br />Mitchell added the covenants allow for landscape structures within <br />• the 50' setback. <br />M_ <br />