My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/17/1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
08/17/1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 9:11:36 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 9:11:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 17, 1992 <br />to <br />( #6) #1758 JAMES LAWRENCE, <br />1550 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 8:03 - 8:04 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. Lawrence was present for this application. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Peterson, to recommend <br />approval of Application #1758 for James Lawrence of 1550 Sixth <br />Avenue North, for a conditional use permit to allow the continued <br />use of the guest house. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />( #6) #1760 ERIC NIELSEN, <br />2140 PROSPECT AVENUE - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:15 - 8:15 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />John Drucker was present for this application. <br />Mabusth explained that the property is typical of the developed <br />sites in the neighborhood. The former residence was removed through <br />the hazardous building procedure. The property has been assessed <br />one sewer unit and the SAC charge has already been paid. She <br />indicated that because of a jut in the rear property line, a 50' <br />setback is required instead of a 10' setback. Staff has suggested <br />that the deck be moved to the west to allow a greater setback in <br />this area, and the applicant has submitted a revised proposal <br />moving the deck and allowing for an 18' setback. <br />Drucker reiterated the difficulty in building on this shape of lot. <br />He noted a long, narrow house could have been built on the <br />property, but the garage would have been the front of the house. <br />Mabusth stated Parcel 15 is owned by a property owner across the <br />street, and there is a small shed on the property. <br />Bellows asked the difference between the proposed house and the <br />former residence. <br />Mabusth stated the former residence was smaller and did not meet <br />any of the required setbacks. <br />Chair Kelley asked how this application compared to variance <br />request in the same neighborhood. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.