My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/17/1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
08/17/1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 9:11:36 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 9:11:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 17, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1759 - CONT. <br />Mitchell noted the Wells have agreed to deed a 6' wide driveway <br />easement to the Profts after completion of this subdivision <br />process. <br />Schroeder asked what will happen if the Wells' septic system fails. <br />Mitchell reported that Schirmers has determined that there is <br />enough room on the Wells' property to fix their present system. He <br />added the Wells' septic situation is not markedabIy different than <br />others on Myrtlewood Road. <br />It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Peterson, to recommend <br />approval of Application #1759 for P. Proft /R. Wells, 60/70 <br />Myrtlewood Road, for preliminary subdivision, including a variance <br />for 70 Myrtlewood Road to reduce a substandard lot area. Ayes 3, <br />nays 1. Bellows voted nay. <br />( #2) #1737 RICHARD HOLLANDER, <br />680 NORTH ARM DRIVE - <br />AFTER- THE -FACT VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />The applicant requested that this issue be tabled until the next <br />Planning Commission meeting. <br />( #3) #1748 ROBERT & RITA HOVLAND, <br />1245 NORTH ARM DRIVE - <br />VARIANCES - <br />REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER REVIEW <br />Rita Hovland was present. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicants have revised their proposal <br />to a 900 s.f. garage, which will still require a 15' setback from <br />the side lot line. The garage is proposed at 25'x36'. She noted <br />with the revised proposal, a lot coverage variance is not <br />necessary. She advised the applicants prefer Option A, which would <br />require a side setback variance to only one side. She stated this <br />lot is a through lot and would need conditional use approval for <br />any accessory structure. <br />Peterson noted at the last review the applicants were asked to <br />reduce the structure into a smaller envelope which has been done. <br />He stated it was also suggested that the gravel parking area off <br />North Arm Drive be abandoned. <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.