My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/20/1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
07/20/1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 9:10:51 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 9:10:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STYROFOAM ORDINANCE - CONT. <br />Cohen suggested a mailing to inform the residents of the City of <br />the new ordinance. <br />Mabusth asked if the ordinance should apply to all styrofoam <br />structures to be used in the lake and if the ordinance would <br />require collector systems to contain debris during transition <br />periods. <br />All Members agreed that it should. <br />Jabbour noted that the issue has been researched by the City for <br />the last two years, and stated that the proposed ordinance was sent <br />to all marina owners for review prior to the public hearing. <br />Gaffron asked whether the Planning Commission would like to make <br />a single all- encompassing recommendation on the draft ordinance. <br />Cohen felt the recommendations given for each item would suffice. <br />( #3) #1746 THOMAS & MARGARET LOWE, <br />2630 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:05 - 7:17 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />• Thomas Lowe was present. <br />Mabusth explained that the majority of the residence is located in <br />the 0 -75' zone. The applicants are proposing a 26x21.8' addition <br />to the southwest corner of the residence, and the removal of 740 <br />s.f. of existing landscape area underlain with plastic and the <br />removal of a 176 s.f. accessory structure to be relocated in the <br />75 -250' setback area. <br />Lowe c I ar i f 1 ed that he i s propos i ng to move the accessory structure <br />on his second lot. He asked that the tennis court be excluded from <br />the hardcover calculations as it is a clay court and allows water <br />to pass through it. <br />Mabusth noted that the C i ty cons i ders c I ay courts as hardcover. She <br />stated an existing portion of the residence is located closer to <br />the lake than the proposed addition. <br />Rowlette stated she had a problem with additional hardcover in the <br />0 -75' zone. <br />Lowe said that this is the only feasible location for the addition. <br />0 4 <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO <br />PLANNING <br />COMMISSION MEETING <br />• <br />HELD <br />JULY 20, <br />1992 <br />STYROFOAM ORDINANCE - CONT. <br />Cohen suggested a mailing to inform the residents of the City of <br />the new ordinance. <br />Mabusth asked if the ordinance should apply to all styrofoam <br />structures to be used in the lake and if the ordinance would <br />require collector systems to contain debris during transition <br />periods. <br />All Members agreed that it should. <br />Jabbour noted that the issue has been researched by the City for <br />the last two years, and stated that the proposed ordinance was sent <br />to all marina owners for review prior to the public hearing. <br />Gaffron asked whether the Planning Commission would like to make <br />a single all- encompassing recommendation on the draft ordinance. <br />Cohen felt the recommendations given for each item would suffice. <br />( #3) #1746 THOMAS & MARGARET LOWE, <br />2630 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:05 - 7:17 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />• Thomas Lowe was present. <br />Mabusth explained that the majority of the residence is located in <br />the 0 -75' zone. The applicants are proposing a 26x21.8' addition <br />to the southwest corner of the residence, and the removal of 740 <br />s.f. of existing landscape area underlain with plastic and the <br />removal of a 176 s.f. accessory structure to be relocated in the <br />75 -250' setback area. <br />Lowe c I ar i f 1 ed that he i s propos i ng to move the accessory structure <br />on his second lot. He asked that the tennis court be excluded from <br />the hardcover calculations as it is a clay court and allows water <br />to pass through it. <br />Mabusth noted that the C i ty cons i ders c I ay courts as hardcover. She <br />stated an existing portion of the residence is located closer to <br />the lake than the proposed addition. <br />Rowlette stated she had a problem with additional hardcover in the <br />0 -75' zone. <br />Lowe said that this is the only feasible location for the addition. <br />0 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.