My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
07-20-1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 9:10:51 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 9:10:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />0 HELD JULY 20, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1753 - CONT. <br />Arnold Carlson, 855 Forest Arms Lane, concurred that the former <br />owner was responsible for those for dredging the channel and the <br />pump house installation. He was unsure about the storage shed. <br />Madge indicated the shed is not a permanent shed. <br />Al Hibbs, applicant's contractor, indicated they were unaware of <br />the additional side yard setback requirement with the enlarged pool <br />area. He felt they could either shorten the pool or shift the pool <br />to meet the requirements. <br />Rowlette noted the landscape plan indicates the use of underliner <br />around the trees to be replanted. She said that an approved <br />underliner can only be used in the drainage swale area. <br />Madge said he would agree to removal of the plastic within the 0- <br />75' zone. <br />Mabusth advised that they are also asked to approve an average <br />lakeshore setback variance for the fence around the pool. <br />Rowlette commented on the new parking area within the 250 -500' <br />zone. <br />Peterson said he was concerned that additional hardcover on the <br />property would only increase the drainage problem for Mr. Carlson. <br />Cohen asked if Madge would be willing to remove the cement in the <br />250 -500' zone. <br />Madge stated he may be willing to remove it but it would be quite <br />costly. He felt this area d i d not affect the drainage in the area. <br />He noted he will redirect drainage under the drive. <br />Hibbs noted that the City asked for hardcover calculations for all <br />zones "for the record only ". <br />Jabbour said he never dreamt that each zone would be treated so <br />independently. He noted the intent of the code is not to take care <br />of drainage to prevent erosion, but to allow the water to naturally <br />percolate prior to entering the Lake. <br />Mabusth added that the property is at a total 25.3% hardcover <br />within the 75 -500' setback area. <br />Peterson asked when they can expect approval from the Watershed <br />District. <br />40 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.