Laserfiche WebLink
0 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. <br />Mabusth explained the updated survey showing the existing <br />improvements on the property. She compared the survey to the one <br />done in 1974. The garage addition done in 1974 was in the 75' <br />setback area and the open deck was considered a non - encroachment. <br />Since that time, there was a permit issued in 1982 which allowed <br />the deck to be enclosed and second story additions and additional <br />decks. The additional decks were destroyed in the 1987 "super <br />storm ". The applicant applied for storm damage repairs under the <br />emergency ordinance. The decks were reconstructed. Sometime in <br />1990 -91, the Inspectors noted the gazebo and lakeside deck. <br />Hollander noted that it was built in 1974 and is in need of some <br />repair. <br />Indritz noted that this is an after - the -fact request to maintain <br />the gazebo and lakeside deck structure. He noted that it is <br />Hollander's contention that these structures have been in existence <br />prior to Orono's adoption of its current ordinances and therefore <br />are grandfathered in. He reviewed photos of damage done to these <br />structures in 1987. He stated they have witnesses that can testify <br />to their knowledge of the construction of these improvements. He <br />explained there was renovation done after the storm damage, but was <br />merely reconstruction of a portion of the existing gazebo. The deck <br />wasn't damaged severely and did not require much reconstruction. <br />He explained that Mabusth has pointed out that the permit issued <br />in 1974 for the addition of the garage, there was an ordinance that <br />prevented the construction of principal residences within 75' of <br />the lakeshore and that is what the variance was for. A portion of <br />the addition was within that zone. Indritz assumed that because <br />there wasn't an ordinance governing decks within that zone, the <br />deck was not included on the site plan. Additional construction <br />was done to the principal structure, all of which was done in <br />conformity to the ordinances in effect at the time. There is no <br />documentation on file to show when the gazebo and lakeside deck <br />structure was constructed, but his client contends they were <br />constructed in 1974. The permit issued in 1982 was to reconstruct <br />the principal residence destroyed by fire and to enclose the deck <br />area and add additional decking. <br />Mabusth noted that the 1982 permit allowed the deck to be enclosed. <br />She explained that currently residents are not allowed to increase <br />the intensity of a non - conforming structure, but back in 1982 they <br />were allowed to do so. <br />Johnson asked what required a permit in 1974. <br />0 10 <br />