My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/20/1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
04/20/1992 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 9:09:02 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 9:09:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />• HELD APRIL 20, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1730 - CONT. <br />Chair Kelley requested that the Letter of Credit be written to <br />include the removal of the existing residence and out Iot buildings, <br />the abandonment of the existing septic system and well, and the <br />construction of the shared drive. <br />Malik asked about the Flowage and Conservation Easement. <br />Mabusth explained that the Easement will be taken over the <br />designated wetland and shall be designated as a drainage easement <br />on the plat. <br />( #3) #1698 JIM RIVERS, <br />1442 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCE - <br />CONTINUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING 7:27 - 7:30 P.M. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Jim Rivers were present. <br />Mabusth explained that the application involves a three season <br />porch on the lakeside of the house. She noted it consists of <br />approximately 317 square feet of hardcover. The applicants' <br />amended application proposes approximately 240 square feet of green <br />area adjacent to the roadway to offset hardcover in the 0 -75' <br />• setback area. <br />Rivers commented that the total green space proposed for both lots <br />is approximately 570 square feet, and he felt that the Commission <br />should consider all the marina property as one as it all works <br />together. <br />Chair Kelley asked if the house to the north was currently <br />occupied, and if not, would the applicants consider removing the <br />house in trade for the deck. <br />Rivers did not think that was feasible. <br />Cohen reviewed that the building permit issued in 1976 noted no <br />improvements for a deck. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicant was granted a variance for the <br />1976 addition to the lakeside of his home, and the permit and <br />building plans specifically stated that only steps for access would <br />be allowed as additional hardcover. <br />Rivers noted that the deck was added at the time of the addition <br />and plead i gnorance as to why the deck was not approved at that <br />time. <br />• 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.